The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

Drone Lands on Astonishingly Steep Surfaces

It uses friction shock absorbers and reverse thrust to land on 60-degree inclines

2 min read
A quadcopter drone resting on the steep roof of a house, with trees in the background

Using specialized landing gear and reverse thrust, this drone is able to land on a rooftop with a 45-degree incline.

Université de Sherbrooke

This article is part of our exclusive IEEE Journal Watch series in partnership with IEEE Xplore.

Drones are able to complete a wide range of useful tasks, but they often require specific conditions in order to land safely. Ideally, most drones need to approach a flat surface at a slow enough speed to avoid bouncing or crashing. One group of researchers in Canada has devised a novel solution to this challenge, which allows drones to land on impressively steep inclines of up to 60 degrees, and at speeds up to 2.75 meters per second.

Through a series of experiments, the researchers demonstrate how their approach can be used to safely land drones on the steep rooftops of homes. The results are described in a study published in the July issue of IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

“At high-impact velocities and on inclined surfaces, commercial multirotors tend to bounce, flip over, or even break upon impact, due to their stiff landing gear,” explains John Bass, a Ph.D. student at the Université de Sherbrooke’sCreatek design lab, in Québec, who was involved in the study. “Our general approach for landing a quadrotor on a steep incline is to combine two technologies—friction shock absorbers and reverse thrust.”

Bass’s team first began exploring combinations of friction shock absorbers and reverse thrust through simulations. Based on the simulation data, they then created the landing gear with friction shock absorbers using micro-DC (direct current) motors, springs, and 3D-printed parts.

“The friction shock absorbers that we integrated on the landing gear slow down the UAV [uncrewed aerial vehicle]’s dynamics enough to successfully exploit reverse thrust,” Bass explains. “[The friction shock absorbers] also promote a continuous contact between the legs and the ground, instead of bouncing indefinitely down the slope as is the case for normal rigid landing gear.”

The team then put their drone to the test, landing it on roofs and landing pads at various speeds and inclines. Bass notes that because the drone can land on a surface as steep as 60 degrees, it is capable of landing on most North American rooftops, which typically have a pitch of less than 53 degrees.

Fast Multirotor Landings on Steep Roofs using Friction Shock Absorbers and Reverse

This capability could be useful for recharging, surveillance, or emergency-landing purposes. The ability to land at high speeds—with less precision and sensing requirements—could be particularly useful during emergency landings.

The proposed landing technique may only be feasible for smaller drones, however. Notably, larger and heavier drones dropping down at fast speeds onto a roof could potentially damage the roof.

The team plans to continue to explore novel ways of landing drones. The lab has previously landed drones on vertical walls and lakes.

“[Our] goal is to further increase the capabilities of UAVs by landing in other difficult scenarios, such as boats in harsh sea conditions, on icebergs, and on fast-moving ground vehicles,” says Alexis Lussier Desbiens, a professor of mechanical and robotics engineering at the Createk design lab who was also involved in the study.

“These scenarios each bring their own new set of challenges, such as a ship’s linear and angular motions when landing on boats, the strong drag force when landing in high wind or at high speed, the turbulent air motion near boats, icebergs, and fast-moving vehicles, and the slippery surfaces of icebergs,” he adds.

This article was updated on 7 September 2022 to clarify that using the landing technique with a larger drone could damage rooftops.

The Conversation (0)

The Bionic-Hand Arms Race

The prosthetics industry is too focused on high-tech limbs that are complicated, costly, and often impractical

12 min read
A photograph of a young woman with brown eyes and neck length hair dyed rose gold sits at a white table. In one hand she holds a carbon fiber robotic arm and hand. Her other arm ends near her elbow. Her short sleeve shirt has a pattern on it of illustrated hands.

The author, Britt Young, holding her Ottobock bebionic bionic arm.

Gabriela Hasbun. Makeup: Maria Nguyen for MAC cosmetics; Hair: Joan Laqui for Living Proof

In Jules Verne’s 1865 novel From the Earth to the Moon, members of the fictitious Baltimore Gun Club, all disabled Civil War veterans, restlessly search for a new enemy to conquer. They had spent the war innovating new, deadlier weaponry. By the war’s end, with “not quite one arm between four persons, and exactly two legs between six,” these self-taught amputee-weaponsmiths decide to repurpose their skills toward a new projectile: a rocket ship.

The story of the Baltimore Gun Club propelling themselves to the moon is about the extraordinary masculine power of the veteran, who doesn’t simply “overcome” his disability; he derives power and ambition from it. Their “crutches, wooden legs, artificial arms, steel hooks, caoutchouc [rubber] jaws, silver craniums [and] platinum noses” don’t play leading roles in their personalities—they are merely tools on their bodies. These piecemeal men are unlikely crusaders of invention with an even more unlikely mission. And yet who better to design the next great leap in technology than men remade by technology themselves?

Keep Reading ↓Show less