The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

Does Today's Aircraft Automation Make Pilots Too Complacent?

Northwest Pilots Have Licenses Revoked For Using Laptops

2 min read
Does Today's Aircraft Automation Make Pilots Too Complacent?

As you all probably know by now, the two Northwest Airlines pilots who flew 150 miles past the Minneapolis International Airport have had their licenses revoked by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for 

"... violations of a number of Federal Aviation Regulations. Those include failing to comply with air traffic control instructions and clearances and operating carelessly and recklessly."

The pilots claim that they had lost track of time while they were working on their laptops trying to figure out their flying schedules. Others believe they had fallen asleep and refused to admit it.

Northwest Airlines said using the laptops was in violation of company policy and it would seek to terminate their employment there. Many airlines also ban any distractions including reading material while a flight is in progress.

On top of the obvious, "What the hell were they thinking?" question, is another about the role of automation and its seductive powers. Accepting the pilots' story on the face of it - which I admit I am skeptical of - it does show a remarkable confidence in the aircraft's automated flight systems, to the point of nonchalantly ignoring them.

There was a video story on yesterday's ABC's World News called "Automation Addiction" that tried to address this issue. Essentially, the story says that many pilots find it hard to not let themselves become complacent or distracted because the aircraft systems are so capable and reliable.

For instance, a story in the Wall Street Journal last week said,

"Commercial pilots are finding they have less to do during routine portions of flights as engines, navigation devices and automated flight-management systems have become more sophisticated and reliable.

"Equipment malfunctions occur so rarely that one of the biggest worries among safety experts is how to keep pilots engaged in monitoring flight instruments. Crews, meanwhile, look for ways to fill idle time on long flights, sometimes leading to spells of inattention."

The ABC News story said that on the new Boeing 787 Dreamliner, pilots will get a written alert and then an alarm will sound if activity isn't detected in the cockpit after a certain amount of time.

Maybe what is needed is for airline pilots to be required to push a button every few minutes like many train engineers have to do to show that they are awake. Although has Homer Simpson showed in the episode, King-Size Homer, ways can be found around that as well.

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less