The October 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

Autonomous cars lend themselves to lending themselves, proponents like to say: we'll rent them instead of owning them. That way, we'll make better use of a smaller number of cars and thus pay much less on average per passenger-mile.

If so, then your next car may well be your last—that is, if you can keep it going for the 3 to 50 years it may take before cars become fully, utterly robotic. Three if you're a techno-optimist like Sergei Brin, of Google and its famous Google Car; 50 years if you're a technopessimist, like Volkswagen research director Jürgen Leohold.

Or maybe you've already bought your last car no matter which side is right. An entire ecosystem of car sharing is aborning right now, thanks to startups like Uber and Lyft, and it's based on merely human drivers. True, sharing would be even more attractive with robots, which probably explains why Google recently invested US $348 million in Uber. The startup was recently valued at around $18 billion—half again as much as Fiat.

How much money would full-bore carsharing save? Larry Burns, the former head of research for General Motors and now the director of the Program on Sustainable Mobility at Columbia University, has estimated that we'd need just 15 percent as many cars as now. That would cut costs per mile by 75 percent in Ann Arbor, Mich., according to his calculations.

Now comes a more elaborate formula from Kyle Hill, a Los Angeles-based web designer and former financial advisor. He figures that the average car in the United States costs $12,700 a year to own, all things included (even traffic tickets). Uber would cost exactly the same, he figures, if you drove precisely 15,170 kilometers a year. Drive more, and owning is the better option; drive less, and Uber is the way to go.

How about simple smartphone apps that help people join together to share a cab? According to a study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers at MIT, Cornell, and Italy's Istituto di Informatica e Telematica del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, people willing to put up with an average delay of just five minutes would be able to share a cab 95 percent of the time. The scheme would cut total, cumulative trip length by at least 40 percent. 

And it works even if the taxicab is dull as dishwater—so long as the phone is smart.

The Conversation (0)

We Need More Than Just Electric Vehicles

To decarbonize road transport we need to complement EVs with bikes, rail, city planning, and alternative energy

11 min read
A worker works on the frame of a car on an assembly line.

China has more EVs than any other country—but it also gets most of its electricity from coal.

VCG/Getty Images

EVs have finally come of age. The total cost of purchasing and driving one—the cost of ownership—has fallen nearly to parity with a typical gasoline-fueled car. Scientists and engineers have extended the range of EVs by cramming ever more energy into their batteries, and vehicle-charging networks have expanded in many countries. In the United States, for example, there are more than 49,000 public charging stations, and it is now possible to drive an EV from New York to California using public charging networks.

With all this, consumers and policymakers alike are hopeful that society will soon greatly reduce its carbon emissions by replacing today’s cars with electric vehicles. Indeed, adopting electric vehicles will go a long way in helping to improve environmental outcomes. But EVs come with important weaknesses, and so people shouldn’t count on them alone to do the job, even for the transportation sector.

Keep Reading ↓Show less