Disney Seeks to Make Visible Light Communication Practical

While using modulated LEDs to transmit data via visible ambient light isn't a new idea, Disney is trying to figure out how to make it work for us

3 min read
Disney Seeks to Make Visible Light Communication Practical
A Disney researcher waves a Li-Fi magic wand and makes a fairy princess dress light up
Image: Disney Research

Visible light communication (VLC) is a method of transmitting data using LEDs. It's a simple idea: since it's possible to turn an LED on and off much faster than the human eye can resolve, you can use lights to transmit binary data in the form of light pulses without any detectable flickering that would drive a human nuts. This data transmission is ambient, detectable by other LEDs (acting as photodiodes), and it seems like a promising way to Internet-of-Thingsify household objects without having to rely on Wi-Fi.

Using modulated ambient light to transmit data isn't a new idea; this "Li-Fi" is already being used commercially, with GE and Philips (among others) deploying data transmitting LEDs in places like stores and warehouses. However, it's difficult to encourage wider adoption of the technology because Li-Fi is generally used in specific (and isolated) situations where it operates alongside existing communications technologies rather than being integrated with them. In other words, you can have Wi-Fi, and you can have Li-Fi, but they don't work together all that well.

For easy and convenient Internet-of-Things-scale adoption, Li-Fi needs to be able to run on the same Internet Protocol (IP) that all of our other Web-connected stuff runs on. Taking the lead on this is Disney Research, which has a visible light communication system that uses a friendly Linux-based networking backbone to, among other things, let you use a magic wand to light up a princess dress. Sign me up.

The Disney researchers explain their work in a video showing off some of the ideas they have for possible applications. 

Visible Light Communication is appealing for Internet-of-Things applications because we already have nearly all of the infrastructure in place to get it to work. LED lighting is prevalent, intelligent LED lighting is becoming more prevalent, and it's all affordable and easy to install for consumers. Existing Li-Fi systems don't usually leverage this, because you need special hardware to get gigabit (or even megabit) bandwidth. But for IoT devices with relatively simple communications needs, the single-kilobit-per-second speed that you can get with off-the-shelf consumer hardware is more than sufficient.

imgFully assembled VLC-enabled light bulb.Photo: Disney Research

Disney Research started with an off the shelf LED bulb, and then modified it a little bit to include a System-on-a-Chip (SoC) running Linux, a controller module, and an additional power supply for the added electronics. The team also added dedicated light sensors to allow the bulb to act as both a transmitter and receiver. On the software side, the controller behaves just like a regular Ethernet interface, meaning that most applications using TCP or UDP sockets can use visible light communication right out of the box. The prototype bulb has Wi-Fi on the chip as well, but it's only used for testing: the light communicates with other lights through VLC only.

The key here is making everything as transparent as possible, so that talking to things over VLC is as easy to do as talking to things over Ethernet or Wi-Fi. Disney used previously developed Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical (PHY) networking layers, with the VLC hardware controller on top, communicating over a serial interface. With all of this in place, Disney experimented with how best to implement IP multi-hop networking, with the goal of allowing communication between light bulbs and IoT-type objects without needing any radio-based technology at all.

Disney's results (you can read the paper here) suggest that the prototype VLC infrastructure they've developed is definitely flexible enough and robust enough to interoperate with the network protocol that we're already using everywhere else. Disney, being Disney, tends to focus on things like toys (they mention the forthcoming "Internet of Toys"), but the Magic Kingdom also talks about things like VLC-based localization services using existing lighting infrastructure that could be a viable alternative to localization based on radio signals. With the minimal hardware required to get all of this stuff to work, it seems plausible that a proactive push to get this technology into consumer LED lighting could be a realistic way to bring about an inexpensive and ubiquitous Internet of Things, sparkly princess dresses included.

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less