Close

Cellphones Take the Witness Stand

Dramatic Palo Alto murder case hinges on iPhone evidence

2 min read
Cellphones Take the Witness Stand

The outcome of a dramatic murder trial underway in San Jose, Calif., may hinge on the prosecution’s cellphone evidence. And, while calling a “cellphone witness” may seem just so Silicon Valley, it’s likely to become commonplace, now that so many people take and use their cell phones everywhere, and police departments are learning how to properly handle cell phone evidence (explained in detail by Richard Mislan in Spectrum’s July article, Cell Phone Crimesolvers).

The case: Bulos “Paul” Zumot, owner of a Palo Alto business, The Hookah Spot, is charged with murdering his girlfriend, Jennifer Schipsi. The couple’s Palo Alto home went up in gasoline-fueled flames in October 2009; after firefighters put out the blaze, investigators found Schipsi’s burned—and strangled—body inside.

Both Schipsi and Zumot were heavy iPhone users. And those iPhones had more to say than either of them might have suspected.

For one, cell phones, even those that don’t use GPS, reveal their locations as they pass in and out of the signal radii of various towers. The carriers keep those location records, which, in a tower-dense area like Silicon Valley, can come quite close to pinpointing a precise spot. According to these records, it appears that on the afternoon of 15 October, shortly before the fire, the two phones travelled together down Highway 101 and called each other, even though police later found Schipsi's phone in her car. The prosecution theorized that Schipsi was already dead when the trip down 101 took place, and Zumot was attempting to set up an alibi. The trail shows the phones nearing Palo Alto shortly before the fire started. The defense countered by introducing instances in which AT&T’s cell phone records had obvious mistakes—with Schipsi's phone occasionally appearing to connect to odd places, including Hawaii—and argued that the location data had been mapped incorrectly.

The prosecution also introduced reams of text messages—including angry messages exchanged with Zumot in the days before her death that had been deleted from Schipsi’s phone.  As Mislan points out, deleted messages can hide away in a chunk of memory known as the subscriber identity module (SIM) and be retrieved by forensic investigators. The prosecution also argued that a message on the afternoon of the fire sent to a third party from Schipsi’s phone was not in her writing style, and more akin to Zumot’s voice.

The trial continues, with the defense presenting this week.

The Conversation (0)

The Cellular Industry’s Clash Over the Movement to Remake Networks

The wireless industry is divided on Open RAN’s goal to make network components interoperable

13 min read
Photo: George Frey/AFP/Getty Images
DarkBlue2

We've all been told that 5G wireless is going to deliver amazing capabilities and services. But it won't come cheap. When all is said and done, 5G will cost almost US $1 trillion to deploy over the next half decade. That enormous expense will be borne mostly by network operators, companies like AT&T, China Mobile, Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone, and dozens more around the world that provide cellular service to their customers. Facing such an immense cost, these operators asked a very reasonable question: How can we make this cheaper and more flexible?

Their answer: Make it possible to mix and match network components from different companies, with the goal of fostering more competition and driving down prices. At the same time, they sparked a schism within the industry over how wireless networks should be built. Their opponents—and sometimes begrudging partners—are the handful of telecom-equipment vendors capable of providing the hardware the network operators have been buying and deploying for years.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less