Over the weekend, the New York Times had an extensive article reviewing the risks of using cell phone while driving.

The Times' story recapped the studies showing the dangers of driving and using one's cell phone ("drivers using phones are four times as likely to cause a crash as other drivers" or about the same as someone with a 0.08 percent blood alcohol level) and how drivers overestimate their own ability to drive and safely use their phones ("81 percent of cell phone owners acknowledged that they talk on phones while driving, and 98 percent considered themselves safe drivers. But 45 percent said they had been hit or nearly hit by a driver talking on a phone.")

Only 5 states and the District of Columbia require drivers to use hand free devices when using their cell phones, while 14 ban texting and driving. The Times story also says that there is no real political will to ban cell phones altogether in vehicles, regardless of the danger created.

I would like to hear about what the laws are in countries outside of the US for both cell phone use and texting while driving. Do any ban the use of cell phones completely in cars?

In addition, the Times story provides a link to a game that demonstrates how your reaction time can be affected by texting. It is a bit sobering, which is probably appropriate.

For last month, there was a story in the June issue Car and Driver magazine that also implied that texting was actually much worse than being drunk behind the wheel.

Car and Driver put drivers on a test track and tested their reactions driving normally, then trying to read messages on their phone as they drove as well as sending text as they drove. They also tested their drivers' reactions while legally intoxicated (0.08 percent blood alcohol level) but without the distractions. The tests were conducted at 35 and 70 mph.

The full results can be found in the article, but the upshot was that driver reaction times while reading or texting were worse than when they were alcohol impaired by fairly significant margins. The magazine didn't do the test when alcohol impaired and reading or texting, mostly I think because no one wanted to be the observer in the test vehicles while the drivers conducted the test.

I supposed you could run your own experiment by playing the Times' game both sober and intoxicated (or by using these goggles) to compare the results.

Finally, because of a recent spate of rail accidents, some of which (see here and here) have been linked to train operators texting, several US transit systems have decided to ban the use of mobile devices for their transit system operators, with even carrying a mobile communication device grounds for being fired.

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less