There was an article in the LA Times a week ago concerning the on-going problems with IT projects in the state of California. The article talks about several projects such as the Financial Information System for California (FI$CAL), which is $300 million over budget and three years behind schedule; a centralized computer system for California's courts which is $1.04 billion over budget (yes, billion), and is at least 4 years late; and the California Child Support Automation System (CCSAS), which has cost $1.5 billion so far to implement, but performs abysmally.
In June, California's CIO launched an IT dashboard project like that of the Federal government to track its projects. The claim was that the dashboard would bring transparency (and hopefully some accountability) to the progress of the state's IT projects.
However, if you look at the project status of the FI$CAL on the dashboard, it shows "green."
But when you drill down a bit more, you find a more detailed status report that says that the most recent milestone was missed, and the reason was because of efforts to re-plan the project, to wit, "developing ... revised milestones and the project roadmap for moving forward."
I guess a "green" project status means something different in California than in the rest of the world.
No wonder the state is in trouble financially.
Robert N. Charette is a Contributing Editor to IEEE Spectrum and an acknowledged international authority on information technology and systems risk management. A self-described “risk ecologist,” he is interested in the intersections of business, political, technological, and societal risks. Charette is an award-winning author of multiple books and numerous articles on the subjects of risk management, project and program management, innovation, and entrepreneurship. A Life Senior Member of the IEEE, Charette was a recipient of the IEEE Computer Society’s Golden Core Award in 2008.