British Gas Allowed to Proceed With IT Project Jupiter $365 Million Lawsuit

Accenture Plans to Appeal Ruling; Says British Gas Claims are Baseless

2 min read
British Gas Allowed to Proceed With IT Project Jupiter $365 Million Lawsuit

A year ago May, I wrote about British Gas suing Accenture for £182 million ($365 million) over an IT project called Project Jupiter which British Gas claimed reduced its customer-billing process to "shambles."

There are two nice stories from 2008 on the dispute here and here in the London Times.

At the time, an Accenture spokesman was quoted by the Times as saying that Centrica [the parent company of British Gas] "conducted extensive testing" on the system before it was handed over. 

The spokesperson added: "We are confident, based on the facts of the situation, that this claim is baseless and without merit. Accenture will vigorously defend the High Court proceedings."

Well, a UK High Court agreed last week that maybe the British Gas claims weren't so baseless after all.

According to a story in this week's London Times,

"On Friday [November 5] the High Court issued a judgment on the preliminary issues raised by Accenture, relating to the wording of a contract between the two companies and a warranty claim. The judgment from Mr Justice Field at the High Court in Winchester was in favour of British Gas on all six points" of alleged contract breaches by Accenture.

The court didn't say that the claims made by British Gas were correct, but that the company had a right to test them in court.

The Times reported that Accenture disagreed with the ruling and planned to appeal. The paper quotes an Accenture spokesperson saying, "There has been no final determination of the case or any of the detailed underlying facts of this case. We remain confident that Centrica’s claim is baseless and that Accenture will prevail when the factual issues are examined in detail at trial."

Hmm, I noticed that the Accenture spokesperson didn't say the British Gas claims were "without merit" this time around.

I wrote in 2008 that I thought the affair would be settled out of court before a trial occurs - I think that even more so now.

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less