There was both a fascinating as well as disturbing story at least to me in the New York Times a few days ago about how computer animation is now being used to depict news stories. That in itself isn't new, but what is new is that the animations depict both facts as well as opinions, if not outright fantasies, of supposed journalists.

The Times article says that Next Media, a Hong Kong-based company with "gossipy newspapers" in Hong Kong and Taiwan released an animation depicting Tiger Wood's wife chasing him with a golf club. The fact that this has never been verified as ever happening doesn't seem to bother the company, and unfortunately, with good reason: their 90 second animation became a top global online video (you can find it easily on

The Times story says that Next Media releases about 20 animations a day of events taken from the Web and Apple Daily, Next Media's Taiwanese newspaper. It has an animation unit that works in the same building as the Apple Daily, and is fully staffed with script writers, programmers, designers and actors.

If the news story lacks facts, the Apple Daily news staff helps fill them in based on their opinion of what might have happened and these are depicted in the animation. The supposed thoughts of the people involved are also depicted in the animation.

While it is easy to dismiss this as just tabloid journalism, the betting in the world of journalism is that this approach will begin to go mainstream in the not too distant future.

William Randolph Hearst  and Joseph Pulitzer would have loved it.

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less