Australia's Internet Censorship Plans Creating Backlash

Hackers Attack Government Websites; Google Refuses to Censor YouTube

2 min read
Australia's Internet Censorship Plans Creating Backlash

I have been following with interest the past 18 months or so the Australian government's controversial plans to censor the Internet. The government has conducted censorship trials which it declared a success last summer, and as a result in December it announced that would formally introduce its plan to blacklist websites sometime in 2010.

Few people were happy about the decision. Privacy and open Internet access groups such as the Electronic Freedom Foundation "co-sponsored" the Great Australian Internet Blackout during the week of the 26th of January as a way of protesting the government's decision, but to little avail.

Things have gotten a bit uglier on the protest front, however, as hackers or "cyber-activists" depending on your point of view have initiated denial of service attacks that have shut down Australian government websites for the past two days. The "activists," says this AFP news story, state that they may keep the attacks up for months if necessary.

The government has cried foul and "has condemned the cyber-attacks as irresponsible and not a legitimate form of political protest against the filter," the AFP story also reports.

In a related story, Google has told the Australian government that the company would not "voluntarily comply" with its request to remove certain YouTube videos.

According to the Sydney Morning Herald, the Australian government just wanted Google to do for Australia what it did on behalf of other governments. The Herald says that, "Communications Minister Stephen Conroy referred to Google's censorship on behalf of the Chinese and Thai governments in making his case for the company to impose censorship locally."

Quoting Minister Conroy:

"What we're saying is, well in Australia, these are our laws and we'd like you to apply our laws... Google at the moment filters an enormous amount of material on behalf of the Chinese government; they filter an enormous amount of material on behalf of the Thai government."

So far, the US government and specifically Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has not come out against Australia's Internet censoring plan as she has against other countries like China and Iran.

Could it be because Minister Conroy praised her speech?

The delicious irony of praising Secretary Clinton's speech while using China's censorship of the Internet as example of why Australia should be able to do the same does seem lost on Minister Conroy.

In some other Internet censoring news, Iran, which claims that Secretary Clinton's new activist cyber-diplomacy policy was aimed at undermining the Iranian government, told Google that it was permanently suspending its Gmail service there. A story in the Wall Street Journal reports that the Iranian government is planning to introduce a national email system, which will no doubt help the Iranian government keep a close eye on its growing dissident factions.

I wonder if the Iranian government will offer its own version of Google's Buzz as a feature of its email system as well?

The Conversation (0)

How Police Exploited the Capitol Riot’s Digital Records

Forensic technology is powerful, but is it worth the privacy trade-offs?

11 min read
 Illustration of the silhouette of a person with upraised arm holding a cellphone in front of the U.S. Capitol building. Superimposed on the head is a green matrix, which represents data points used for facial recognition
Gabriel Zimmer

The group of well-dressed young men who gathered on the outskirts of Baltimore on the night of 5 January 2021 hardly looked like extremists. But the next day, prosecutors allege, they would all breach the United States Capitol during the deadly insurrection. Several would loot and destroy media equipment, and one would assault a policeman.

No strangers to protest, the men, members of the America First movement, diligently donned masks to obscure their faces. None boasted of their exploits on social media, and none of their friends or family would come forward to denounce them. But on 5 January, they made one piping hot, family-size mistake: They shared a pizza.

Keep Reading ↓Show less