Close

Study: 6G's Haptic, Holographic Future?

Possibilities and challenges for future 6G communications networks

3 min read
6g hologram with fingers approaching it
ISTOCKPHOTO

Imagine a teleconference but with holograms instead of a checkerboard of faces. Or envision websites and media outlets across the Internet that allow you to make haptic connections (i.e. those involving touch as well as sight and sound). Researchers studying the future of sixth-generation (6G) wireless communications are now sketching out possibilities—though not certainties—for the kinds of technologies a 6G future could entail. 

Sixth-generation wireless technologysays Harsh Tataria, a communications engineering lecturer at Lund University, Sweden—will be characterized by low latencies and ultrahigh frequencies, with data transfer speeds potentially hitting 100 Gbps. Tataria, along with colleagues from Lund University, Spark New Zealand, University of Southern California (USC), and King’s College London, recently published a paper in Proceedings of the IEEE, presenting a holistic, top-down view of 6G wireless system design. Their study began by considering the challenges and technical requirements of next-generation networks—and forecasting some of the technological possibilities that could be practically realizable within that context.

Such future-casting is to be expected as 5G deployment picks up speed around the world, at which point subsequent generations of wireless technologies come more into focus. Tataria calls this “a natural progression,” to look at the emerging trends in both technology and consumer demands. “When we look at 6G, we’re really look[ing] at vastly connected societies,” he says, “even a step beyond what 5G is capable of doing, such as real-time holographic communications.”

“Using holograms as the medium of communication, emotion-sensing wearable devices capable of monitoring our mental health… will become the building blocks of networks of the future”

The study outlines what it calls a “high-fidelity holographic society,” one in which “Holographic presence will enable remote users [to be represented] as a rendered local presence. For instance, technicians performing remote troubleshooting and repairs, doctors performing remote surgeries, and improved remote education in classrooms could benefit from hologram renderings.” The authors note that 4G and expected 5G data rates may not enable such technologies—but that 6G might—owing to the fact that “holographic images will need transmission from multiple viewpoints to account for variation in tilts, angles, and observer positions relative to the hologram.”

Even simple phone conversations could involve new levels of multimedia-rich experience. “For example, in this interview…we could be talking to the rendered presence [of each other],” says Mansoor Shafi, another study co-author. “And that would provide a much richer experience than the audio call we are having at the moment.”

Another promising possibility the study teases involves what they call a haptic Internet. “We believe that a variety of sensory experiences may get integrated with holograms,” the authors write. “To this end, using holograms as the medium of communication, emotion-sensing wearable devices capable of monitoring our mental health, facilitating social interactions, and improving our experience as users will become the building blocks of networks of the future.”

Mischa Dohler, another co-author, believes that 6G will consolidate the “Internet of skills” or the ability to transmit skills over the internet. “We can do it with audio and video, but we can’t touch [through] the Internet…[or] move objects.” The consolidation of edge computing, robotics, AI, augmented reality and 6G communications will make this possible, he says. “This next generation Internet…will democratize skills the very same way as the Internet has democratized information.”

Molisch also hopes that 6G will bring better chip-to-chip communication. “As we go to 200 Gbps or more…the cable connections are just not able to keep up,” he says. “As we are [moving] to higher data rates, higher processing speeds…wireless links are one way in which this bottleneck can be overcome.” This also means increased reliability as wireless connections are not impacted by shaking or vibration, and lower costs because replacing cables “might be more expensive than just putting in wireless transceivers on to the chips.”

Other use cases mentioned in the paper involve what they call extremely high-rate “information showers”—hotspots where one can experience terabits-per-second data transfer rates—mobile edge computing, and space-terrestrial integrated networks. But, as Molisch cautions, “There is [still] a lot of research that needs to be done…before the actual standardisation process can start.”

With 6G going up to terahertz frequencies, there will be tremendous challenges in building new hardware as well, the researchers say. Better semiconductor technologies will also be needed for faster devices. Other challenges remain as well, including power consumption.

With frequency bands moving up in the hundreds of gigahertz, “even fundamental things like circuits and substrates to develop circuits [are] extremely tricky,” says Tataria. “So getting all those things right, and going from the fundamental-level details all the way up to building a system is going to be substantially harder than what it first came across.” Their study, therefore, attempts to explore the trade-offs involved in each futuristic technology.

As the authors point out, this study is not a comprehensive or definitive account of 6G’s capabilities and limitations—but rather a documentation of the research conducted to date and the interesting directions for 6G technologies that future researchers could pursue.

The Conversation (0)

The Cellular Industry’s Clash Over the Movement to Remake Networks

The wireless industry is divided on Open RAN’s goal to make network components interoperable

13 min read
Photo: George Frey/AFP/Getty Images
DarkBlue2

We've all been told that 5G wireless is going to deliver amazing capabilities and services. But it won't come cheap. When all is said and done, 5G will cost almost US $1 trillion to deploy over the next half decade. That enormous expense will be borne mostly by network operators, companies like AT&T, China Mobile, Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone, and dozens more around the world that provide cellular service to their customers. Facing such an immense cost, these operators asked a very reasonable question: How can we make this cheaper and more flexible?

Their answer: Make it possible to mix and match network components from different companies, with the goal of fostering more competition and driving down prices. At the same time, they sparked a schism within the industry over how wireless networks should be built. Their opponents—and sometimes begrudging partners—are the handful of telecom-equipment vendors capable of providing the hardware the network operators have been buying and deploying for years.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less