The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

There was a story a few days ago in the London Mail on Sunday reporting that the personal details of some 250,000 fans who bought tickets to the 2006 World Cup in Germany through official Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) ticket outlets have been stolen and then sold off for some £500,000.

The information not only contains financial information on ticket holders, but their passport details.

A criminal investigation has been launched to try to determine who stole and sold the database of information, and another investigation is also being conducted to try to determine why FIFA did not delete the information as required by international agreements.

According to the Mail on Sunday, the information included details on 50,000 Swedish and Norwegian fans, 20,000 American citizens, 36,000 Swiss nationals, 42,000 Portuguese and 36,000 Dutch fans, as well as thousands more supporters from Poland, Italy, Germany, France, Spain and Croatia.

The scheme came to light when the details of the Swedish and Norwegian fans were recently offered for sale. Included were the personal details of former Swedish Prime Minister Ingvar Carlsson and former Minister of Integration Jens Orback. This has led to fears that other dignitaries who traveled to the 2006 World Cup may have had their information compromised as well.

The Mail quotes FIFA as saying:

"We are currently investigating this case and have no further comments at this stage."

Hmm, not even an apology to World Cup ticket buyers that says that FIFA takes security seriously?

I'm disappointed.

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less