I have issues with this attempt to make the general public our guides for the development of science and technology. On the one hand, I am cynical enough to think that the policy has been already been laid out and that the powers-that-be are engaging in a kind of charade to appease any public outcry. On the other hand, I fear that the same powers-that-be may actually be sincere and take the recommendations of the public too seriously.
But those are my somewhat jaundiced reasons for not really getting behind public engagement, I am sure those that are idealistic enough''or maybe just realistic enough''would welcome these kinds of public dialogues.
So I imagine when the Australian government decided to hold a public dialogue on nanotechnology in food it never occurred to them that the one constituency they were counting on being there would decide to skip it in a huff.
That's right your friendly neighborhood NGO decided they weren't going to engage in this dialogue.
The officials in the Australian government who set this all up must feel like they went to the trouble of hosting a party they didn''t want to give, and the guest of honor refuses to go because they prefer surprise parties.
I would like to humbly recommend that if we can''t even get to the point of discussion, can''t we just move on?