Forum: Our Readers Write
First Published September 2006
“My identity was stolen in 2003 in an entirely
low-tech way—from the chart hanging on the end of my
hospital bed” —Robert D. Parker
Identity Crisis
My identity
was stolen in 2003 in an entirely
low-tech way—from the chart hanging on the end of my
hospital bed. The thief rented apartments, ran up
utility bills, opened credit card accounts, and
rented ski condos using just my Social Security
number; he didn’t even have my correct name or my
address.
He stole about US $50 000 and was never caught. It
took my wife and me over two years of continuous
work and about $20 000 in legal fees and forfeited
income to get this all off our credit cards.
The biometric solutions Anil K. Jain and
Sharathchandra Pankanti propose [“A
Touch of Money,” July] might help with
the credit card issue, but until the Government
prohibits the use of your Social Security number for
driver’s licenses, Medicare IDs, medical IDs, and a
multitude of other things, identity theft will
remain an easily committed and seldom-punished crime.
Robert D. Parker
IEEE Senior Member
Reno, Nev.
Jain and
Pankanti would like to see fingerprint
sensors everywhere. I would like to see them, and
all biometric sensors, banned. The last thing anyone
needs is to have a finger cut off or an eye cut out
by some person stealing a credit card or a car—as
has already happened in Malaysia (see http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4396831.stm).
Even if the sensor can distinguish between a live
body part and one recently detached from its owner,
that won’t stop the thieves from trying. No property
or bank balance is worth losing a body part for!
Alan Chattaway
IEEE Member
Surrey, B.C., Canada
Really Robotic
Having
read “Robots Can Ape Us, But Will They
Ever Get Real?” [Spectral
Lines, July], I’ll argue that
greater-than-human intelligence either won’t happen
or will happen rather a long time from now. Carnegie
Mellon roboticist Hans Moravec basically suggests
that computers will become intelligent once the
hardware is sufficiently fast. Google’s 100 000-node
distributed computer should be close to having
processing power equivalent to a human’s; it should
therefore show signs of self-awareness if Moravec is
right.
Maybe the Google cluster is a bit small, but
throughout the world we have a network that is on
the order of a billion processors (more if we
include mobile phone handsets). These are fairly
well integrated via things like SETI@home and
peer-to-peer file sharing, address book
synchronization, Alexa toolbars, and so on. So if
computers can become self-aware, the Web should be
starting to show signs of self-awareness by now.
Chuck Simmons
Redwood City, Calif.
Concerned Reader
The
sidebar “The
Big Data Bang” in “Old World, New
Grid” [July] states that at CERN the “largest of the
detectors, ATLAS, fills an underground cavern over
six stories high. It is expected to detect 1 billion
collisions per second.”
This detection rate seems improbably high on
several grounds, but I will mention just one. Even
at the speed of light, particles from one collision
will be able to travel only 30 centimeters on
average before those from the next collision are
generated, creating a number of “waves“ of particles
in a large detector simultaneously. Even if all
particles travel at close to the speed of light, so
that the waves do not overlap, how are the various
events going to be isolated?
Bruce Carsten
IEEE Member
Corvallis, Ore.
Authors Fabrizio
Gagliardi and François Grey respond:
The numbers in the article are correct, but reader
Carsten is very astute. Indeed, although there are a
billion collisions per second on average, the
protons travel in bunches, so the detectors are read
out “only” 40 million times per second, which is the
bunch-bunch collision frequency. There are then a
series of online filters that sort out on the fly
whether a given bunch-bunch collision contains an
event of significance. Most of the time, this is not
the case, so the data are stored at “only” about 100
events per second. Indeed, even at this rate, the
large majority of the events stored are background.
It is estimated that of the 8 million or so events
that will be stored every day for further analysis
on the international EGEE grid
(http://www.eu-egee.org), on
average just one will contain the trace of a Higgs
boson—if the Higgs boson exists!
Shedding Light
In his
Reflections on “Famous
People” [July], Robert W. Lucky stated
that “every person would know that Edison invented
the electric light.” Though a majority of people
might think that Edison invented the electric light,
he did not. Electric light was developed in the form
of arc lamps roughly 70 years before Edison improved
the electric lightbulb, which, just to be clear, he
did not invent either.
Sebastian Stüker
IEEE Student Member
Karlsruhe, Germany
Readers are invited to comment on material
published in IEEE Spectrum and on matters of
interest to engineering and technology
professionals. Letters do not represent opinions of
the IEEE. Short, concise letters are preferred. The
Editor reserves the right to edit letters and limit
debate. For more letters, see “And More Forum” at
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org.
Contact: Forum, IEEE Spectrum, 3 Park Ave., 17th
floor, New York, NY 10016-5997, U.S.A.; fax, +1 212
419 7570; e-mail, n.hantman@ieee.org.
|