LA School System BLUNDER
I have long argued that the IT community needs to separate IT failures from blunders.
Most organizations do not have enough IT project failures. The reason I say this is that, in my experience, most project cancellations (or escalations for that matter) are not true failures but instead represent blunders. There is a big difference. A project failure is one in which most project decisions and actions were correct at the time, but for some reason the project didn't work out. It is a professional project -- the project risks were assessed, managed, and accepted where required; the assumptions were checked; success criteria were defined; the plan was estimated and funded well; the stakeholders participated; and so on.
Project blunders, which I contend most project overruns and cancellations are, arise from Dilbert-like approaches to project management and implementation. There is little or no risk management, the project plan is a fantasy, stakeholder concerns are given short shrift, and on and on.
Well, in a distressingly familiar story in today's LA Times, yet another IT blunder is described. The lede paragraph reads as follows:
Since launching a $95-million computer system six months ago, the Los Angeles Unified School District has been beset by programming glitches, hardware crashes and mistakes by hurriedly trained clerical staff. The result: tens of thousands of teachers, cafeteria workers, classroom aides and others have been underpaid, overpaid or not paid at all.
Sounds like a blunder to me.
Let's see, there are some 14,500 school districts in the United States, along with over 4,000 colleges and universities. I would guess, 99.9% have automated payroll systems. I would also hazard that packaged payroll systems have been around since the mid-1960s - the LA's own payroll system has been around since 1967 or so.
And yet, after all this experience, a school system - even as large as LA's with 100,000 employees - cannot get a payroll system to work properly? INEXCUSABLE.
When the problems first appeared, it was claimed that only a small percentage of employees were affected. Now it looks like about 50% have been affected - so much for the effectiveness of their system testing.
"Let me apologize officially for this failure.There is no excuse for it. I apologize to anyone who has been hurt by this, " so said LA's school district Supt. David L. Brewer.
An apology, not matter how sincere, won't pay the bills. And LA taxpayers should refuse to pay for this IT blunder either.
Risk Factor
Comments