What’s Wrong with this Profession?
Robert W. Lucky has long been the most
lighthearted spokesman within our profession, so if
he concludes that “the trends are bad”—most notably
fewer young Americans choosing to become
engineers—then we all have reason to feel
discouraged [“U. S.
Engineers and the Flat Earth,”
Reflections, March]. Of course, with ever more
engineering jobs offshored, thousands of “emergency”
visas issued to foreign engineers—and leaders of
industry ascribing this to their need to pursue
profits—we should be prepared for depressing news.
Samuel C. Florman, IEEE Life Member, New York, N.Y.
The writer is
chairman of Kreisler Borg Florman and the author
of many books on engineering.
Shortage? What shortage? I read Robert W. Lucky’s
column with disbelief. False alarms about pending
shortages of college science and engineering
graduates have been popping up since the 1970s. It’s
just a crass attempt to keep the job market stuffed
to bursting, all in the name of “competitiveness.”
The drop in science and engineering enrollment is a
natural response to market forces, one that’s been
delayed two decades partly because of false alarms
like those sounded by Lucky and government and
university personnel who have a fiscal interest in
keeping the classrooms and laboratories full.
There has been a glut of science and engineering
graduates at all degree levels in the West ever
since the Great University Expansion reached its
peak circa 1975. This grad glut has caused stagnant
salaries and poor prospects of advancement for
hundreds of thousands of young Ph.D.s looking for
tenure-track professorships. So let’s not warp
reality with talk of shortages.
Lance Nizami, IEEE Member, Decatur, Ga.
I submit that we don’t attract more U.S. students
to engineering because of how some prospective
students view our profession. We engineers are
seldom viewed as being in touch, let alone in
charge. We need to fix this negative perception. We
need to recognize when we’ve put technology above
human relationships and when we’ve idolized our
designs without regard to their consequences. While
technology can mitigate crises like climate
change, resource depletion, poverty, and war,
engineers must confront the fact that technology
has made these problems worse—and made them global.
The IEEE could have a leading role in this fix. It
might start by giving social responsibility a more
prominent position, along with better support for
members. That support might help us resist
lucrative salary offers from promulgators of
weapons, spam, and porn, among other pollutants.
Scott Wiley, IEEE Member
Portland, Ore.
Robert W. Lucky has captured the U.S. situation.
Sure, you can put the onus on elementary school
teachers, but what about overworked parents, greedy
business leaders, and irresponsible elected
officials? Popular media idolize entertainers and
athletes and seem to regard engineering and science
as toxic. Few parents in the developed countries
want their children to become engineers, if being an
engineer ultimately means competing against
engineers in China or India on salary. It’s more
profitable to open a laundry, which requires no
costly college education.
Following the greed lead, in the United States
anyway, most graduating engineers are interested
in business positions that offer quick economic
gain, not a quiet, steady lifetime in the lab. And
corporate America won’t fund research—not because
it can’t, but because it must prostrate itself
before the altar of the financial investment
community, going for short-term results.
Wayne Bowen, Sequim, Wash.
Meteors Are a Ham’s Best Friend
In the Dream Jobs profile of Sigrid Close
[“Star
Struck,” February] is the statement: “It
turns out that meteors, as well as the ionosphere
itself, disrupt radio signals.” That depends on
your point of view! While Close’s concern is about
communication between satellites and Earth, the
ionosphere can help in communicating from one point
on Earth to another. Many amateur radio operators
routinely bounce their signals off ionized trails
caused by meteors and thereby communicate over
longer distances than would otherwise be possible.
Myron A. Calhoun IEEE Life Member, Manhattan, Kan.