Kuiken knew this would be the best chance at
controlling the arm with intent, because the surface
electrodes can't tell the difference between a muscle
twitch in the forearm and a muscle twitch in the
pectoral muscle. The result—the ability to move the
artificial arm as if it were your own—is always the
same. At DARPATech, Jesse Sullivan (an electrician whose
arms were amputated at the shoulder in 2001 after he was
nearly electrocuted by a high-voltage wire) used the
Proto-1 arm to gesture unconsciously while talking,
shake a reporter's hand without trying to adjust for
grip strength, and eat small pieces of candy. The
movements of the arm were totally—almost
eerily—natural.
When Sullivan thinks about opening his hand or moving
his elbow, instead of causing a twitch in the muscle of
his hand, those spikes cause a twitch in his chest
muscles. A surface electrode picks up those signals and
translates them into mechanical motion. “When Jesse
flexes his wrist, he's doing it by thinking about making
that motion,” says RIC's Kuiken. “The limb figures out
the signals and what those patterns are, and then it
causes the limb to move the way he intended. He's not
thinking about some series of steps; he's thinking about
moving his normal, regular arm.”
Most notably, Sullivan was able to “feel” pressure
when it was applied to his index finger and not on some
other part of his body, where a small vibrating motor
might vibrate. When the reporter squeezed the tip of the
Proto-1 arm's thumb, Sullivan showed her the location on
the hand where he could “feel” the pressure in his
phantom limb: at the base of the thumb. Early last year,
Kuiken had discovered that in addition to allowing
intuitive muscle control, rerouted nerves unexpectedly
sensitized the skin on the chest. But the volunteers
didn't feel the sensation in the chest—they felt it in
the phantom limb. Kuiken has been working to refine the
map of the phantom limb to determine the connection
between the exact location on a prosthetic finger and
the corresponding feeling perceived in the phantom limb.
He's hoping for a one-to-one match soon, so that when
the tip of the thumb is squeezed, the corresponding
feeling will be in the phantom thumb's tip. Kuiken says
the patients were also able to feel hot and cold.
Harshbarger says that some volunteers have been able to
use sensory-encoding tactors developed at Northwestern
University for the Proto-2 arm to distinguish paper from sandpaper.
But what if for whatever reason these unused areas of
muscle are unavailable or damaged? Another way to access
the peripheral nerves is with penetrating electrodes
that intersect the nerves with what are essentially
needles. Researchers at the University of Utah developed
an implantable device called the Utah Slant Electrode
Array (USEA), a 5-millimeter-square grid of 100
needlelike electrodes. These electrodes hold hundreds of
different mechanisms, among them signal amplifiers,
storage registers, and a multiplexing scheme to transmit
to a receiver on the skin. Like the injectable sensors,
these can be powered wirelessly and extract a signal in
real time. Unlike IMES, however, the electrode arrays
access the nerves directly, instead of the muscles
obeying the nerves. That subtracts, in theory, another
layer of signal interference. The electrode arrays are
still in experimental stages. Harshbarger says they will
be used this year.
Finally, the most extreme solution is meant for people
whose bodies no longer offer any means for interfacing
to the artificial limb, for whom even nerve-rerouting
surgery may not be an option. In such cases, the Utah
electrode arrays are relocated to the source of all
neural signals—the brain's motor cortex, which is right
at the top of the head, toward the back of the frontal
lobe. The electrode arrays are either placed on the
inside surface of the top of the skull near the motor
cortex or penetrate directly into the motor cortex. A
device very much like the skull-mounted USEA has already
been proven to pick up the brain's electrical signals
and is currently used to warn epileptic patients of
impending seizures. When electrodes penetrate directly
into the motor cortex, embedded electronic circuits
intercept the motor neurons firing their instructions
and, with the help of complex algorithms, translate the
related signals into a language that can control the
mechanics of the arms.
It may take combinations of these methods to offer the
most natural control and feedback. As a result,
Harshbarger wants to push the limits of all four tiers
of interface. Rather than expecting the user to learn
how to control the prosthetic limb, Harshbarger wants
electronics that learn how to figure out what the user
wants the arm to do. “We don't want the user to have to
learn a new strategy for activating muscles in order to
control the limb,” he says. So far, Sullivan has been
able to put on a hat without looking in a mirror.
Harshbarger says his next goal is for Sullivan to start
typing. “Well,” he qualifies, making hunting and pecking
motions, “more like the way I type.”