PHOTO:Hans-Peter van Velthoven
|
for a slide show of Delft
University solar racers, past and present
|
Every two years, some of the world’s brightest young
technologists get together in Australia to race across
the continent on sunbeams alone. This World
Solar Challenge, as it is known, is one of
the greatest technology-based competitions on Earth. And
since entering their first car in 2001, teams from the
Delft University of Technology, in the Netherlands, have
never lost.
Can the Dutch team grab an unprecedented fourth
straight victory in the 2007 race? Despite the team’s
recent domination (the smallest margin of victory was 33
minutes), it’s not a sure thing. The reason is that this
year, it’s going to be a whole new race. In the 2005
contest the team’s winning entry, Nuna3, averaged 103
kilometers per hour—pretty close to the 110 km/h
official speed limit on many Australian highways. So for
this year’s race, which begins on 21 October, race
officials rewrote the rules to make the cars safer—and,
probably, slower.
For the first time, the drivers will have to wear
crash helmets and sit upright, under a protective roll
cage. The solar collector panels on the cars will also
be limited to 6 square meters.
Members of the Dutch team, known as the Nuon Solar
Team after its main sponsor, one of the largest Dutch
electric utilities, are embracing the recent rule
changes with their characteristic combination of grit
and swagger. “The technical challenge is back,” says
Oliver van der Meer, a team member who is working on the
aerodynamics of the vehicle. “So we can show our prowess
again,” he adds with a grin.
This past May, with five months to go before the start
of the 2007 race, a reporter from IEEE Spectrum dropped
in on the team at its comfy and frenetic headquarters in
a building on the Delft campus. The team allowed the
reporter to see the sleek, injection-molded
composite-material body of its new vehicle, Nuna4, which
it had just created and which was sitting upside down on
a workbench in a nearby garage.
They forbid any pictures of the new racer, which is to
be officially unveiled on 26 June. But they took the
reporter on a tour that included their , whose 29
hours, 11 minutes in 2005 was the best ever for the
approximately 3000-km race, first run in 1987. (That
year, a car from General Motors called Sunraycer won
with an average speed of 67 km/h.)
“It’s really an engineering competition now, rather
than just putting more efficient solar panels on a light
car,” says van der Meer, who, that Dutch name
notwithstanding, actually hails from Portland, Oregon.
Because the driver now has to sit upright, the front
cross-sectional area of the cars must be larger, and the
aerodynamics challenge that much greater, he notes. To
design the new car’s aerodynamics, he assisted Susan
Luijten, an aerospace engineering major and big Formula
1 racing fan.
“Three months of CFD” (computational fluid dynamics),
he says, to sum up the magnitude of their effort. “And
another month and a half in a wind tunnel, with two
different models,” he adds. Is he happy with the
results? “Let me tell you, it’s some extremely
threatening data,” he says, the grin reappearing.
The total drag area of Nuna4 is higher than that of
Nuna3, van der Meer says. But that’s because the frontal
surface area of Nuna4 is considerably larger. Nuna4’s
coefficient of drag—which does not take into account
surface area—is lower, he adds.
Not only will the Nuon team not disclose the drag
coefficient of Nuna4, it won’t reveal what the
coefficient was for Nuna3. But in general, the
coefficient for some competitive racers of that year was
around 0.07. The frontal area of a solar racer is
typically about one square meter or less. Those values
multiply to give a total drag area of about 0.07 square
meter. For comparison, a typical passenger sedan would
have a total drag area about ten times that size.
Remarkably, despite the additional safety features
demanded by the new rules, the Nuna4 car will be lighter
and stiffer than Nuna3, promises Hjalmar Van Raemdonck,
who is the team’s structural designer. Nuna3’s weight
was about 190 kilograms. Van Raemdonck credited the use
of advanced structural design methods from the aerospace
industry for Nuna4’s presumably ethereal lightness.
The team lunches together every day in its cramped
office. Today, it’s “Turkish pizzas”—a big pita rolled
and stuffed with a mouth-searing pizza filling and
salad. They swig from bottles of cola and kid each other
about their weight—the drivers haven’t been chosen yet,
and the final selection will depend as much on body
weight as on steely nerves and lightning reflexes. On
tables, shelves, and the floor, crates of energy drinks
and Belgian beer, loaves of bread, and bags of apples
share space with various exotic, ultrahigh-performance
vehicle parts: ceramic bearings, lightweight steering
racks, and aramid-fiber tires from Michelin with
superlow rolling resistance (they cost €250 apiece).
It’s easy to see why budgets for competitive cars are
now creeping toward US $2 million. Not including beer.
“They think I’m a reckless driver,” van der Meer
confides. “No, you’re just too fat,” quips Tine
Lavrysen, the team’s petite communications director,
laughing. They’re both on the short list to be drivers.
Asked how the Nuon Solar Team has managed to so
thoroughly dominate in the competition, Lavrysen thinks
for a moment before responding. “Every team starts new,”
she says. There are 11 people on the Nuon Solar Team,
and not one of them worked on Nuna3. The 11 were chosen
by Nuna3’s team, who then had very little to do with
Nuna4, other than offering occasional informal advice
when asked to do so. “Because we start new each time,
there are more chances of drastically changing the
design. We can be really innovative,” says Lavrysen, a
Belgian who just earned her bachelor’s degree in
industrial design engineering. Other teams are typically
far larger than Nuon’s, with people coming and going and
working on more than one vehicle during their college years.
While the secret of their success may be moot, their
record isn’t. “They have a great legacy,” acknowledges
Brian Ignaut, the leader of the team from the University
of Michigan, a perennial rival. “They came out in 2001,
and kind of blew everyone away,” he notes. “And since
then, they’ve evolved—their designs have gotten better,
and their overall execution is really clean.”
And while it’s great to have that kind of reputation,
it comes with a certain burden. “We’re gonna have a big
problem on our hands if we don’t win,” says van der
Meer, bravado slipping momentarily. “We’ll be shamed for
the rest of our lives.” Then the grin comes back. He
likes their chances.