The last major revolution in electronics design was
the development of solid-state microelectronics
technology. This leap led to integrated circuits and
fostered the information age. To facilitate the promise
of microelectronics, the U.S. Department of Defense in
concert with the producer and user communities,
developed a standardized approach to product quality,
testing, and acceptance.
For more than two decades, MIL-STD-883 and
MIL-M-38510 were the universally accepted standards for
the manufacturing, inspection, testing, and delivery of
hybrid microcircuits. Today, we are on the edge of the
next great change. Nanoelectronics is a subset of the
field known as nanotechnology. It is loosely defined by
the White House subcommittee that coordinates the
National Nanotechnology Initiative, as the purposeful
creation of structures 100 nanometers in size and
smaller, where a nanometer (nm) is one billionth of a
meter.
We do not have the luxury to remain passive and
wait for the "other guy" to do the job.
With investment by government agencies worldwide
expected to exceed US $3.5 billion, this technology
promises to revolutionize the electronics industry,
spawn new product families, and change the way products
are designed and manufactured. The first nanoelectronics
components are expected to be in production in a few
years, and these could cause silicon-based technologies
to become as obsolete as the vacuum tube.
Significantly, nanoelectronics fabrication and
manufacturing happens at the molecular level, and here
the physics of nanoparticles is often very different
than that of the same materials in larger specimens. In
addition, millions if not billions of the nanoscale
components will need to be produced at one time. To
accomplish this, product quality must be kept at levels
heretofore unattainable, and the potential impact on the
producer's ability to reliably deliver compliant
products is daunting.
As we enter the nanoscale world, two things become
clear. The product is too small for us to measure
directly many characteristics without advanced
microscopy, and the divide between product and process
is blurred to the point that we may not be able to
examine one without the other. These and other
unresolved challenges call for a rethinking of today's
quality assurance paradigm when addressing
nanoelectronics. A new family of process controls,
instrumentation, and criteria that will facilitate
compliant, reliable, and cost-effective production is
now required.
It is imperative that a high degree of
standardization be developed in the measurement of
product compliance and functionality. Whether the
products are used as is or as components of more complex
products, acceptability must be measured the same way
with the same instrumentation. Data resulting from the
acceptance process must be recorded with standard
metrics that are easily comparable across production
lots and suppliers. This criterion makes it mandatory
that an industrywide acceptance standard for screening,
testing, and verification of nanoscale products be
developed.
The Department of Defense (DoD), the American
National Standards Institute (ANSI), the American
Society for Quality Control (ASQC), or the International
Organization for Standardization (ISO) must take the
lead in this endeavor. Whichever becomes the agency of
choice in the development of nanoelectronics products
testing and acceptance specifications, the final rules
must be universally accepted by the producers and end
users of products, as well as the member communities of
the other standards-generating organizations.
The electronics industry, in both defense and
commercial applications, will see the first
nanoelectronics-based products within the next two years
and is expected to see an explosion of applications
within ten years. The timeline to develop and implement
the new techniques, criteria, and instrumentation is
short. We do not have the luxury to remain passive and
wait for "the other guy" to do the job. In the United
States, it will take the combined efforts of the DoD,
the electronics industry, and the major research
universities to pull it off.
To ultimately create a set of product standards that
can be accepted worldwide is the real objective. But we
have to get started now. Under the umbrella of the
National Nanotechnology Initiative, a consortium must be
formed within the next six months to begin a process
that should take no more than two years to complete. We
need to form a small, representative group to begin the
process early in 2006.
Time is of the essence, and we must work as a team to
create the infrastructure that will facilitate the
design, production, and delivery of our
nanoelectronics-based products of the rapidly
approaching future.