Photo Illustration: Brandon Palacio
Atmospheric Water Generation
Extracting freshwater from thin air is a seductive idea, especially for arid places that see little rainfall but are also very humid, like parts of Mexico and South America. A number of companies now sell home-scale atmospheric water generators—basically glorified dehumidifiers.
The WaterMill, for example, from Canada’s Element Four, can produce up to 11 liters of drinking water a day (what an average family might use on a tight water budget). The appliance uses an ultraviolet lamp to kill bacteria and bugs. Element Four dreams of using its atmospheric generators to supply safe drinking water in poor rural areas. But a planned 20-liter-per-day generator can soak up 720 watt-hours per liter, and such places often have an unstable electricity supply, or none at all. And when you consider where the electricity comes from, the WaterMill makes even less sense. A typical coal-fired power plant consumes about 1.8 liters of water per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated. If that’s your power source, it would actually take 1.3 liters of water to make one liter of water. Really.
Still, the device is headed for testing in Australia, Mexico, South America, and the Bahamas, where the main goal is just to have a consistent source of clean water, no matter the energy cost.
Photo Illustration: Brandon Palacio
Fire Ice
Researchers have been studying methane hydrate for decades. The volatile substance, a combination of methane gas and water ice, exists in cold and high-pressure environments, such as Alaskan permafrost or beneath ocean sediments. Scientists estimate that the world’s supply of methane hydrate could dwarf the combined energy stored in all other fossil fuels. And methane is a much cleaner-burning fuel than gasoline, oil, or coal.
Extracting it is a different story. Think of methane hydrate as an icy cage that traps the methane molecules inside. To release the natural gas, you either warm the substance or ease the pressure; the methane vaporizes, essentially leaving behind a puddle of water. Accessing the methane hydrate to do either of these has proved difficult because the energy costs of both nearly outweigh the benefits.
But there might be another reason to tap the substance. Most research has focused on extracting the methane, but it turns out the water itself may have value. ”The water from gas hydrates will by nature be fresh with no impurities,” says Timothy Collett of the U.S. Geological Survey. A team of researchers at Sandia National Laboratories led by geochemist Jeffery Greathouse has looked into separating methane hydrates from the salty water that surrounds them by exploiting the density difference between the salt water and the hydrate-trapped freshwater.
But the researchers will still face the same problem that’s stymied scientists elsewhere: figuring out a cost-effective way to separate the methane from the water. Despite heavily funded studies in many countries, including the United States, Japan, India, and China and funding in the hundreds of millions, nobody has managed to do that.
Comments