Capital goods sales leader General Electric Co.
increased R&D spending by 16.2 percent, but it
remains at the bottom of its sector for R&D
intensity at just 1.6 percent. In fact, GE's R&D
intensity is at the bottom for the Top 100 overall along
with Nestle SA and Deutsche Telekom. Such a low R&D
intensity, though, isn't as shocking as it first
appears. R&D intensity can vary widely among a
firm's divisions, especially in conglomerates like GE.
For example, GE is in business lines like entertainment
and financing that have little or no R&D spending,
but it also builds aircraft engines, a business in which
it makes significant R&D investments.
R&D growth for capital goods over the past five
years has been a better than average 41 percent, nine
points higher than sales growth. As a result, the sector
increased its share of the Top 100 from 9 percent to 10
percent.
Also increasing its share of the Top 100 is the
consumer durables and apparel sector. Most of this
sector's firms in the Top 100 are consumer electronics
or film companies; no apparel firms made the list. The
sector as a whole increased its spending by 11.4 percent
in the past year. Four firms increased R&D
spending—Kodak, Matsushita, Sanyo, and Sharp—while
three—Fuji, Philips, and Sony—decreased it. Over the
five-year period, 2000 to 2004, the sector's R&D
spending grew by a better than average 33 percent, in
line with sales growth.
But even robust sales growth does not necessarily
translate into more R&D funding. The materials
sector, which includes chemical companies like BASF,
Bayer, and DuPont, decreased its year-over-year R&D
spending in 2004 despite sales growth of 29 percent. In
this sector, every single firm's ranking in the Top 100
slipped at least one place in 2004. Some of this
slippage was due to drops in spending, like Bayer
Group's 12.7 percent cut, but in other cases spending
increases, including those for BASF AG, did not keep up
with those of other firms. Over the five-year period,
the sector's R&D intensity dropped from 5.6 percent
to just 4.4 percent.
On the other end of the spectrum, the software and
services sector had the highest R&D intensity, 14.7
percent. The sector had only three firms in the Top
100—Microsoft, Oracle, and SAP—all packaged-software
firms. Microsoft dominates the sector, accounting for 69
percent of its R&D, up from 59 percent five years
ago. However, Microsoft dropped to No. 7 on the overall
leaderboard after capturing the top spot for the first
time in 2003.
Microsoft's R&D spending decreased 20.5 percent
in 2004 despite an increase in R&D employees.
According to its U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
filings, the decrease was "due to lower stock-based
compensation expense." As we discussed in detail last
year, in 2003 the company began offering its employees
stock-based compensation in lieu of options. This
affected its R&D accounting significantly, because
almost half of Microsoft's employees work on R&D.
Unlike software and services, telecom services'
R&D has not kept up with sales growth. The sector
has just three firms in the Top 100—Deutsche Telekom,
Nippon Telegraph & Telephone, and DoCoMo. R&D
spending dropped year over year for the sector in 2004.
Although spending fared better from 2000 to 2004,
growing 16 percent, it didn't keep up with sales growth
of more than 50 percent. As a result, the sector has the
lowest R&D intensity, at 2.1 percent. Also worth
noting is that, with the exception of Deutsche Telekom,
no U.S. or European local telephone service providers,
long-distance carriers, or cellular firms rank in the
Top 100.