IEEE Spectrum logo Continue to site ➔
ADVERTISEMENT

Tech Talk iconTech Talk

The Ubiquitous Nano-Enabled Consumer Product List

It seems that ever since nanotechnology first started getting mentioned in the mainstream media, it has been incumbent upon the reporter to make a list of all the consumer products that contain nanotechnology (but of course not without first trotting out the â''1 to 100nm sizeâ'' definition).

Now we have a 287-page book that lists all these consumer products, and adds in products that contain MEMSâ'¿I suppose to lengthen the listâ'¿not quite sure.

When I first started to see these lists in news stories, I sort of saw them as big parentheses: â''Time to go on to the next paragraphâ''. But then I realized how entertaining these lists can actually become, you should try it yourself.

The ones used for the PR for this new book are some of the most entertaining yet.

Hereâ''s one: â''Lab-on-a-chip devices that can detect a heart attack in just minutesâ''. I am pretty sure when you are having a heart attack, you can detect it yourself without any aid in â''just secondsâ''.

This one had me scratching my head: â''Sensors implanted into the body to wirelessly monitor pressureâ''. After mulling this one over, I decided they meant â''blood pressureâ''. Not quite sure, but thatâ''s my pick and I am going to stick with it.

Not sure why you would need a sensor implanted in your body to monitorâ'¿well, any kind of pressure. It seems the ones they just put on the outside of your body do a pretty good job.

Oh the list goes on, and itâ''s fun. Like I said, you should try it.

Control your iPod with your teeth

capt.sge.mka59.200807170009.photo00.photo.default-512x373.jpg

Photo: AFP/HO

The AFP has a story today about a head gear that lets people control their music players by clenching their teeth.

The thing "uses infrared sensors and a microcomputer," the AFP reports, and it was created by a Osaka University research team, which "hopes to put the device to commercial use for music players and believes it can eventually be adapted to run cellphones, wheelchairs and other products."

The photo above shows Osaka University researcher Kazuhiro Taniguchi wearing a prototype of the teeth-controlled hands-free device on his glasses.

And how does it know which button you want to push? "The computer receives a command when the user clenches his or her teeth for about one second -- which differentiates the action from other activities such as chewing gum and talking," the AFP reports, adding: "In the laboratory, grinding right teeth can play and halt music on an iPod while clenching left teeth makes it skip to the next track."

And if you wear dentures and wonder whether the device will work for you, good news: the Japanese researchers say the system "can be used by anybody who can chew food with their teeth -- real or artificial."

Fairchild Semi to Celebrate the Big Five-Oh

The people at Fairchild Semiconductor are tooting their horn these days over the upcoming celebration of their 50th birthday. Obviously, it's a big deal for them, but why should you care? Because the computer or device you're using to read these words depends in large part on the fundamental breakthroughs that the founders of Fairchild made a half century ago. Moreover, the creation of this semiconductor company stands as a dramatic lesson in how progress advances in fits and starts, inspired by individuals when they have the right conditions in which to work their magic.

The story of Fairchild Semi is one of those iconic tales of the rise of Silicon Valley. Like Hewlett and Packard before them and many others since, the company's founders decided they had a great idea and they wanted to pursue it as they alone saw fit. To many tech insiders, especially those interested in the roots of modern computing, their story has become legendary. It begins with the invention of the transistor and a brilliant but eccentric scientist named William Shockley.

In the years prior to World War II, Shockley and a group of researchers at AT&T Bell Labs probed the possibility of creating a solid-state alternative to the vacuum tube triode, the underpinning of then contemporary electronics. After the war, Shockley was put in charge of a group at the labs that developed the first transistor. For their work on the breakthrough, Shockley and his colleagues John Bardeen and Walter Brattain would some years later receive the Nobel Prize in Physics. Shockley was a man possessed of a difficult temperament, however, and in 1954, he and the management at Bell Labs parted ways. Two years later, Shockley convinced businessman Arnold Beckman to back his plans to create an advanced solid-state circuit design that would be as revolutionary to the transistor as the transistor was to the vacuum tube. When he moved to Palo Alto, Calif., to start a subsidiary of the Beckman Instruments Co., not a single researcher in his old Bell Labs group accepted an offer to join him. So Shockley set about recruiting a contingent of some of the brightest young minds in America.

Among the 20 prodigies he recruited, Jean Hoerni, Gordon Moore, Robert Noyce, and a handful of others quickly became convinced that Shockley was pursuing the wrong course and that what the team should really be doing was working on simple silicon-based transistors using the latest manufacturing techniques. The disagreement simmered and conditions within Shockley Semiconductor Labs soon boiled over, with the head of the namesake firm supplying most of the heat. By the summer of 1957, seven staffers decided they had endured enough and one of them, Eugene Kleiner, approached an investment specialist he knew to make inquiries on behalf of the group to find a backer who might put up the capital to start a new company.

The management of the Fairchild Camera and Instrument Co. just happened to be looking for a way to diversify into the budding transistor business. So a deal was reached with the unhappy Shockley scientists and engineers. In return for start-up funding, Fairchild would back an independent subsidiary upon condition that it be given an option to purchase the interests of the founders upon mutual consent. The group consisted of Hoerni, Kleiner, and Moore, plus Julius Blank, Victor Grinich, Jay Last, and Sheldon Roberts. Noyce, who had been trying to reconcile the differences between the temperamental Shockley and his subordinates, finally threw in the towel and joined the breakaway team.

In October of 1957, the eight members of the new Fairchild Semiconductor Co. opened shop for themselves. An angered Shockley immediately blasted the ideas of the group and labeled them the Traitorous Eight. The initial Fairchild Semi team, however, simply shrugged off the vitriol from their former mentor (who now held a Nobel Prize in his hands) and proceeded to design a new solid-state unit called a mesa transistor. Encountering trouble with its performance, they experimented with novel ways of enhancing its reliability.

Hoerni soon came up with an ingenious method of spreading a photosensitive and etch-resistant coating over the silicon-oxide surface of the unit and exposing it to light interrupted through a photographic plate carrying the image of the base regions desired. Then the oxide layer of the unit was chemically etched so that only the exposed area remained. After the photosensitive coating was removed and the unit was bathed in a diffused gas containing the desired amount of positive or negative impurities, windows could then be etched in the re-grown oxide to make contact with the diffused layers of the unit, or wafer.

Hoerni called the complex procedure the planar process. It was to become one of the most important inventions of the 20th century. Noyce saw the potential of the new manufacturing method and set out to exploit it. He soon realized that by using the planar process a designer could re-create the components found on a typical circuit board of the time and etch them onto the silicon wafer itself. The aluminum layer used to make contact with the base and the emitter of the transistor could also be used to interconnect different electrical components, such as resistors and capacitors. It was a second breathtaking advance in the space of a year. Noyce had conceived the basis of the integrated circuit -- the foundation of modern computing (and just the sort of revolutionary discovery Shockley had been searching for).

In October of 1958, the Fairchild Eight agreed to a buy-out arrangement with Fairchild Camera and Instrument for lucrative stock holdings. They went on to pioneer other improvements to the technology of integrated circuits, soon to be called microchips. Many of the Fairchild Semi principals eventually drifted away from their start-up to pursue other interests in academia and industry. Hoerni founded Union Carbide Electronics in 1964. Noyce and Moore launched Intel Corp. in 1968. Kleiner co-founded the venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins in 1972. In all, they blazed a trail through the world of electronics that few have ever matched in consequence.

Now, the inheritors of their legacy at Fairchild Semi would like to honor them and the history of the company they began. To celebrate their golden anniversary, a team of alumni volunteers has planned a series of commemorative events for 4-6 October at the Computer History Museum in Silicon Valley. Further information can be obtained at a special Fairchild@50 site on the Web. Organizers would like the message to go out that all "Fairchildren" are welcome to attend and participate.

They have a lot to be proud of. Enough to toot their horn as loudly as they want.

The Nanotechnology Race: Whatâ¿¿s at the finish line?

There is a new round of laments about how the US has fallen behind other countries in nanotechnology development after it was one of the first countries to establish a national nanotechnology initiative in 2000.

Indeed an estimated 35 other countries have announced some kind of nanotechnology initiative. But thatâ''s just the countries, there are countless regional economic development groups pushing to make themselves â''nanotechnology hubs."

The idea, I suppose, is that if a new industrial revolution is coming in the form of nanotechnology they want to make sure their region enjoys all the employment growth that it will bring.

All this jockeying for position to become the next â''Silicon Valleyâ'' I am afraid is misplaced. Nanotechnology's economic benefit will not sort itself out in this way.

If there is to be any realized benefit for all these countries and regions trying to make themselves attractive to nanotechnology development, it will be that they have refocused their educational systems to promote science instruction and that they will examine their resource- or industrial-based economies to make them more knowledge-based economies. Also, a lot of construction companies will make a bundle building all the new facilities.

But the US or any other country is not going to become the one, international hub for a yet to materialize nanotechnology industry. In fact, no nanotechnology industry will ever materialize.

Nanotechnology is an enabling technology that will support other industries and technologies. If you do not have the underlying industries that nanotechnologies will help support, itâ''s not clear what kind of economy you are going to create by selling nanomaterials.

In the best case scenario, the nanotechnology race will lead to many countries and regions improving their educational systems and moving their economies to more sustainable knowledge-driven one. But being a leader in nanotechnology? Not likely.

LimeWire's Latest Move

In May, I wrote a featurefor IEEE Spectrum about the plight/fight of the peer-to-peer service, LimeWire.

This week, the site announced that it will be opening a "digital music store," where users will be able to purchase files that are free from Digital Rights Management constraints. Yes, that's a direct blow against major online music sites like iTunes and eMusic, which imposes stricter limitations. Mark Gorton, the visionary engineer behind LimeWire, recently stepped down as CEO but remains chairperson.

Faulty Valve Suspected in NYC Steam Blast

A news item in today's New York Daily News reports that a state regulator has found that a crucial valve had malfunctioned prior to last month's massive steam explosion near Grand Central Terminal.

In an affidavit, the engineer who oversees steam services for the New York Public Service Department, Thomas Dvorsky, stated that a steam trap at 41st Street and Lexington Avenue, which should have been draining water from the steam pipe in question, wasn't operating and had a possible debris buildup. The failure of the trap could have led to a condition in the pipe called a water hammer, which can lead to a catastrophic surge in pressure.

While the investigation into the rush-hour explosion, which killed one and injured scores, is ongoing, preliminary tests on the stainless steel trap found it was defective.

"The nondestructive testing was inconclusive; it just showed the trap assembly was not working properly," Dvorsky wrote. He added that the trap should be cut open to look for "sediment or foreign materials in the trap that prevented functioning."

The affidavit was filed in Brooklyn Supreme Court in a lawsuit against Con Edison brought by the family of a driver who was seriously injured by the explosion on 18 July.

[For more on the Midtown Manhattan steam blast, see "New York City Rocked by Steam Pipe Blast" in this space and a backgrounder on urban steam power in this month's online feature "Source of New York Steam Blast Is a Literal Mystery".]

In Brazil, Itâ¿¿s Laptop to the People

from the desk of Spectrum associate editor Erico Guizzo:

As a Brazilian expat coming to live in New York City several years ago, I was surprised to see people sipping cappuccinos at a Starbucks while tapping away at their laptops. What surprised me was not that people would pay US $3-plus for coffee but rather that they would carry their laptops around and use them at a public place.

In Brazil, a laptop is pretty much a luxury item. Students, for example, canâ''t usually afford one. Only corporate types can be seen with such objects of desire. An avalanche of taxes, added to the cost of importing the machines, sends their prices through the roof. Consider, for example, a Hewlett-Packard Pavilion notebook (15.4-inch screen, AMD Turion 1.6 GHz processor, 1 gigabyte of memory, 100 GB hard disk, and DVD-RW drive). In the United States, it costs $775 on HPâ''s online store. In Brazil, the same model costs $2112 at Submarino, Brazilâ''s main online retailer.

In the past few years, however, something remarkable has happened.

Prices began to drop, and sales of laptops are now skyrocketing. According to a recent study sponsored by the Brazilian Electrical and Electronics Industry Association (ABINEE), notebook sales this year should increase 211 percent versus last year. To put that in perspective, consider that desktop sales are expected to grow only 6 percent. Counting notebooks and desktops, sales of computers should top 10 million in Brazil this year, a growth of 23 percent over 2006. (By comparison, PC sales should reach nearly 70 million in the United States.)

The reason for such dramatic change is a combination of lower interest rates, government-awarded tax breaks, and stronger participation of both Brazilian and foreign computer manufacturers in a market once dominated by shady businesses selling smuggled equipment. The ABINEE study says that on the supply side there used to be just two or three major companies supplying computers to retailers; now there are about 50.

In fact, Brazilian technology news site IDG Now reports that Brazil is currently Intelâ''s seventh largest market, behind United States, China, Japan, Germany, U.K., and France. By 2010, Intel expects Brazil to become its third biggest market, with only United States and China ahead.

Brazil should embrace this wave of less expensive computers and try reduce prices even more. The high cost of electronics (not only computers but also videogames, digital cameras, and other devices) puts the country at great disadvantage in a technology-driven world where an increasingly large share of our knowledge, culture, and economy depends on those machines. The government has implemented a lower-cost PC program, but much remains to be done, especially in terms of eliminating excessive taxes.

Oh, and as for those big and pricey cups of coffee, Iâ''d always thought theyâ''d never work in Brazil, a country fond of its â''cafezinho,â'' an espresso served on a tiny cup, but late last year Starbucks opened two stores in Brazil. Hopefully customers are bringing their laptops with them.

Most Commented Posts

Tech Talk

IEEE Spectrum’s general technology blog, featuring news, analysis, and opinions about engineering, consumer electronics, and technology and society, from the editorial staff and freelance contributors.

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up for the Tech Alert newsletter and receive ground-breaking technology and science news from IEEE Spectrum every Thursday.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Load More