Tech Talk iconTech Talk

Oscar Pistorius Sweeps Sprint Events at Paralympics

He was once barred from competing in the recent Summer Olympics because international athletics officials deemed his high-tech prosthetic legs gave him an unfair advantage against able-bodied runners.

Oscar Pistorius took the gold today in the 400 meters at the Paralympics in the Bird's Nest stadium in Beijing, wrapping up a triple event sweep of the short distances in the worldwide track meet for persons with disabilities. According to an account from the Associated Press, Pistorius finished first in the 400 with a time of 47.49 seconds, a world record for his disability class.

The win matched similar performances in the 100- and 200-meter events, giving the South African double-amputee three gold medals in Beijing to go along with a gold he earned in the 200 at the Athens Paralympics in 2004.

Dubbed "The Blade Runner" by the media, Pistorius was born without fibulas in his lower legs and had both limbs amputated in early childhood. As a young man, he took an interest in soccer after being fitted with prostheses. This led to a passion for running and an historic collaboration with one of the world's top prosthetic design firms, Ossur of Reykjavik, Iceland, which built customized carbon-fiber prosthetic legs for him.

The early chapters of the Pistorius story have been chronicled here at IEEE Spectrum over the last three years. European journalist Marlowe Hood introduced us to the "fastest man on no legs" in November 2005 in an online feature called Born to Run. From time to time since then, we've updated the progress of Pistorius in his quest to graduate from a competitor in the Paralympics to one in the Olympics and other world-class track meets open to all comers.

(For example, see our blog entries Officials Question Amputee Sprinter's Tech Legs and Double Amputee Oscar Pistorius Can Try for Olympics on the controversy over Pistorius's carbon-fiber racing prostheses.)

Although Pistorius was eventually cleared to compete for a spot on the South African team at the Beijing Games, he faced a challenge of meeting a minimum qualification time of 45.55 seconds in the 400. He could only muster a competitive 46.25 run against able-bodied runners from his country. That left the Paralympics as his only recourse this year.

Still, Pistorius has his sites already set on the next Olympics to be held in London in 2012, as well as upcoming international meets. For that, he will have to build on the momentum he's achieved up till now to become even faster, a challenge that he said today will require "a lot of work."

"I have five or six able-bodied meets in Europe next year and those are all stepping stones to get to the bigger meets," Pistorius noted. "I'm looking forward to next year's calendar and [the] next four years."

We're looking forward to seeing how he overcomes the latest hurdles in a race to achieve his dream.

Out of Africa: Fish versus fishing

I spent last Sunday morning on the beach in West Africa. To be precise, I spent last Sunday morning observing Fante fishermen, bringing in their catch in the shadows of Cape Coast Castle, an old slaving fort that stands as a bleak reminder of human cruelty.

The Fante men fish four or five men to a wooden boat. The boat is essentially carved out of a long long. For nets, the men use manufactured nylon things, and most days, either before or after going to sea, men repair the nets themselves, stitching holes with their own hands.

The outboard motor is another technology that, along with nets, revolutionized West African fishing some 50 years ago. These motors are considered so important that government continues to sell them to fishermen at subsidizes prices.

Little has changed lately, however, so the fishermen of Fanteland face a crisis. High birth-rates have transformed the demographics of the Atlantic coast of Ghana (and elsewhere in Africa). Youth flood the beach, helping to pull to the shore the heavy wooden boats and then sort the dayâ''s catch, which is quickly transferred to women fish mongers seated in front of plastic bowls set on the sand.

The younger men dream of running their own boats, but older men occupy the positions on board and launching new fishing boats is costly. A single hand-made boat, without an outboard motor, can cost nearly $1,000.

The Internet is a distant echo for the fishermen of Cape Coast. Neither does the mobile phone â'' now owned by one in five Africans, according to the World Bank â'' shape their working lives. The sea remains dangerous. Every year some number of Fante are lost in the choppy waters. The fish catch, meanwhile, grows smaller, at least on a per fisherman basis. Less fish per fishermen means less money.

Nevertheless, fishing remains economically important in Ghana.

Fish farming ought to ease the burdens of the Fante fishermen but to fish farm they would have to move inland and they do not wish to do so. They are married to life on the coast. And Africaâ''s small but growing number of fish farmers face their own constraints, notably the cost of feed for farm-raised fish.

In the abstract, fish farming seems like a panacea, but the cost of feed has risen alongside the cost of food for humans. The same corn that people eat, fish eat too. So fish farmers in Ghana find themselves competing for resources with human consumers.

Ultimately, the solution for both ocean fishermen and aqua-farmers turns on technological change â'' and the openness of tradition-people to adopt not only new tools but also new ways of life.

Ex-Intel Engineer Caught Stealing Chip Recipes

Businesses struggle mightily to keep their secrets. They spend billions on firewalls and encryption schemes meant to keep out the wolves at the door. But there is still little that can be done when the perpetrators are trusted parties. Intel got a first-hand reminder of that cold reality in June, when it was discovered that Biswamohan Pani, a design engineer at the companyâ''s Hudson, Mass., R&D facility, pilfered the recipes for some of the chipmakerâ''s soon-to-be-released offerings.

Sure, Pani helped develop the recipes for chips such as Intelâ''s Itanium, perhaps adding morsels that made them more appealing to the companyâ''s legions of customers. But Intel owns the rights. And the way he carried out the caper suggests that he knew his actions would leave a bad taste in his employerâ''s mouth and possibly land him in hot water.

Pani turned in his Intel apron at the end of May. But by that time, he had already been hired by Intel rival Advanced Micro Devices to cook up some competitive designs at one of its R&D kitchens. Shortly after he reported for duty at AMD on 2 June, he apparently remembered that:

1) he was, technically, still a full-fledged Intel employee, with all the rights and privileges thereof;

2) one of those privileges was access to an encrypted database containing a cache of what are essentially top-secret recipe cards for Intelâ''s chips, plus drawings meant to ensure that the finished products are not half-baked.

The FBI alleges that Pani helped himself to 100 pages of these recipes and 18 drawings. His supposed intent: to blend these trade secrets into the mix at AMD, thus sweetening its batters and becoming a renowned chef.

But when he was clumsily designing this ruseâ''which included a suspicion-diverting story about him going to work for a hedge fundâ''he apparently overlooked one fatal defect. He hadnâ''t figured out how to prevent his former colleagues at Intel from discovering that he was having his chips and eating them too. Once they caught a whiff of what he was up to, his duplicity was sniffed out with simple system access check. Now his goose is cooked.

Underground Coal Combustion

UPDATE BELOW

An article in the Wall Street Journal reports on a technology it says is getting a lot of attention in China, which itâ''misleadingly, I believeâ''refers to as underground coal gasification. That makes it sound as if coal is gasified, as in IGCC, creating a syngas thatâ''s burned. But actually the technology seems to more closely resemble oxyfiring, a technology Vattenfall is just now demonstrating for the first time at larger-than-laboratory scale at a plant in East Germany. In the approach described in the Journal, coal is ignited underground and fed a piped-down stream of pure oxygen; the combustion yields nitrogen-free gases including carbon dioxide, which can be separated and kept underground.

The Journal says this technology was invented in the Soviet Union in the 1930s and demonstrated at a large scale in Uzbekistan.

Coal combustion in China and India is the biggest single aspect of the long-term climate problem, and was the subject of a two-issue special report in IEEE Spectrum, in November and December 1999.

UPDATE, 9/18/08:

My fellow energy writer and editor Peter Fairley has alerted me to an accuracy in this blog. From the cryptic Wall Street Journal description of the technology, I came away with the impression that it was closely analogous to oxyfiring, where coal is burned in an atmosphere of pure oxygen. Underground coal gasification is in fact more closely analogous to IGCC, inasmuch as a syngas consisting of carbon monoxide and hydrogen is created, as well as methane and carbon dioxide. The combustible gases can be burned at the surface to drive turbines; in some situations at least, the carbon dioxide can be stored in the subsurface voids left by the gasified coal.

A basic description of the process and its variants can be found at:

http://www.coal-ucg.com/publishedarticleonucg.html

Out of Africa: Goodbye Solar, Hello Nuclear Power

There is a curious, even strange and demented, technological trend underway in Ghana, a west African country which recently made a major oil discovery and boasts large hydro-electric resources.

Ghana wants to go nuclear.

The country may be bathed in sunshine. It may even have potential supplies of wind and thermal power. And Ghana can essentially "harvest" enormous amounts of electricity by vastly reducing "transmission losses" from its venerable Volta dam complex.

And yet despite all these energy supplies, real and forecasted, Ghana's government is training hundreds of people in order to staff a planned nuclear-power plant that would be the country's first.

The planned plant would open ten years from now.

But well before 2018, nuclear power could become a serious distraction in Ghana, consuming brains and funds that would better go towards grabbing the "low-hanging" fruit in the country's energy mix.

Ghana isn't the only African country talking up nuclear power. Recently, Nigeria stunned the world when its government announced a desire to install many nuclear-power plants around its densely-populated country. Nigeria went so far as to strike an accord with Iran last month over assistance in developing nuclear power.

The logic behind Nigeria's nuclear embrace is peculiar: The country's broken infrastructure means frequent electricity shortages. Even gasoline pumps often go dry because of the poor condition of the country's refineries.

If Nigeria can't run an oil-refinery, why is the government even contemplating the much more challenging task of running nuclear power plants?

Well, maybe Nigerians are simply jealous of nearby neighbor Ghana. The country has a better record of managing infrastructure than Nigeria. Yet Ghana hardly seems a candidate to join the list of nuclear power countries. Ghana has barely mastered the challenging "arts and crafts" of road-building. Internet communication remains very costly and afflicted by reliability problems. The country is home to perhaps 500 world-class engineers, not enough to meet current needs no less than demand caused by a new nuclear plant.

As it happens, I am in Accra, Ghana's capital, as I write. With a presidential election less than 90 days off in Ghana, the public isn't thinking about nuclear power. In the past, Accra's tiny environmental community has staunchly opposed an African nuclear delusion. From sizing up Accra over the past 10 days, my bet is the opponents will rise again.

Flying the Rails at 360 kph

Air France-KLM, Europe's leading air carrier, is going electric. Forget about visions of battery-electric airplanes. EV technology has its work cut out just commercializing battery-electric cars, let alone trying to catapult hundreds of passengers into the air. Instead, Air France is recognizing the energy-efficiency and convenience of commuter trains and hitting the rails.

Last week the Paris-based airline launched a joint venture with European bus and train operator Veolia to offer high-speed rail service between London, Paris and Amsterdam beginning in 2010 -- the year that EU laws will open international rail travel to competition. For technology they are eyeing a new generation of high-speed coaches that's nearing completion: the Automotrice à Grande Vitesse or AGV under development by France's Alstom.

The AGV is faster, more efficient and can haul more passengers than its predecessor, the TGV. In speed tests in 2007 the AGV hit 574.8 kilometers per hour -- within spitting distance of the speed record set by Japan's maglevs. Alstom expects the AGV to cruise at 360 kph in regular service -- about 40 kph above the TGV's limit.

Italy's NTV is building rails for the first AGV's, which are expected to begin rolling there in 2011.

The AGV setting the world speed record for travel on (as opposed to above) rails:

Alstoms%20AGV%20Setting%20a%20World%20Record%20in%202007.jpg

Being in three places at once through blogs and social networking

twittercapture.jpg

Be careful what you wish for. Havenâ''t we all thought how great it would be if we could somehow manage to be in three places at once? Well, thanks to a mostly decent internet connection, social networking tools, and the willingness of others, mostly journalists, to open up their trains of thought to the world, last Tuesday I sort of made it happen.

I was attending the TechCrunch50 conference on 8th Street in San Francisco, listening to product launches from startup after startup. Nearby, at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts, Steve Jobs was getting ready to take the stage to tell members of the press and analysts about the next big thing coming from Apple. And down in San Diego, another group of startups were doing demonstrations of their never-seen-before high-tech products at DemoFall. I wanted to know what was happening everywhere, immediately. Actually, I wanted to be in all three places.

So I started opening up windows in my browser. I found two group Twitter feeds from the Demo conference; one a selected group put together by CNET, another anyone-can-join group set up by EventVue. Twitter is what blogs were last year, that is, the fastest way to get information from any event. People using twitter pop out 140-character descriptions of exactly what they are doing, hearing, or thinking at the moment; they can do this via computer, blackberry, or cell phone. Individually, these â''tweetsâ'' donâ''t mean much, but put a bunch of them together and you quickly get a sense of the buzz around an event. So by watching the Demo twitter feeds I could tell when I wasnâ''t missing much or when something really exciting was happening that I should check out by going to the demonstratorâ''s web site.

Then I added two windows to watch live blogs from the Apple event. A lot of bloggers live blog, but I figured two was enough to make sure I was getting the straight story. I chose Gizmodo and Digital Daily.

I also opened up a Twitter feed of TechCrunch50 itself; Iâ''m not sure why, I was there in person, but it was available and itâ''s kind of fun to track what the person next to me is thinking.

Of course, with all this taking of information I was doing I thought I ought to be doing a little giving. I started twittering myself. (Spectrum editors do twitter, go here to follow us.)

This all set up, I turned my eyes to the live demos in front of me. Every time the demonstrator paused I updated one of my browser windows, during the reset time between demonstrators (about two minutes out of every nine), and whenever a demonstration was leaving me completely cold, I quickly scanned all my feeds and perhaps got out a tweet of my own. I pretty soon had a mental map of what was happening in all three places. I felt energized, unbelievably productive, enamored with all the technology at my fingertips.

At the end of the day I was completely, utterly, wiped out, but still operating in overdrive. Turns out that spending a couple of hours trying to be multiple places at the same time takes the same mental and physical toll as a Jolt-cola-fueled all nighter. This is a dangerous condition to be in, fortunately, the only victims were my bank account (I got a $30 parking ticket because I put my money in the wrong parking payment machine) and my teenâ''s newest shirt (I pulled it out of the washer in shreds, realizing belatedly that it should have been hand washed or drycleaned). I donâ''t think Iâ''ll be trying to be three places at once again anytime soon.

Is Balanced Reporting in Nanotech Possible?

If a major newspaper like the New York Times had to cover a story about the physical nature of the planet Earth, the headline might read â''Earth Could be Round; Opinions Differâ'', or so surmised one of the Grey Ladyâ''s columnists, Paul Krugman.

Thus is the state of journalism today; any argument, no matter how outlandish, no matter how unsubstantiated by facts or science, is given the same weight in the careful, but often ludicrous, balancing act that goes into today's news coverage.

I couldnâ''t help but think of this when I saw this Public Television segment on nanotechnology. The video came to my attention because it contains an interview with former NIOSH Director Dr. John Howard, and for that reason it is worth a watch.

But what got me curious was that they decided to use Sheila Davis, executive director the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (SVTC), who I blogged on here as the counterpoint to the â''Nanotechnology is Goodâ'' argument.

She did not disappoint. In her first sentence, she described the field of nanotechnology as a â''gold rushâ''. I am sure that all the struggling nanotech-focused companies out there wish that description were true. And she added, â''No one is thinking about what happens at the end of the life of those products.â''

Erâ'¿I think a lot of people are thinking about that issue. In fact, she is immediately contradicted in the segment as Nano-Tex, even though they are not producing nanoparticles, devotes a lot of its resources to determining the safety of its products.

But that aside, itâ''s interesting how Davis seems to be arguing here that the issue is not about the toxicity of nanoparticles, but about the safety of the products that are enabled by nanoparticles. Then argues later that the companies in the Silicon Valley are not obligated to meet any regulatory standards for these products.

There are a number of regulations for introducing any product into the US market. You can argue that the regulations do not address the use of nanoparticles, but you canâ''t say they are not subject to regulations.

So, this just goes to show, if you scream and yell, and write lots of material arguing that the â''world is flatâ'', you too will get coverage in an article describing Earth.

Energy Trade Magazine Scores Palin Mini-Coup

EnergyBiz, a nicely done and growing trade magazine founded several years ago, features an opinion column in its September-October issue by vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin, in which she makes the case for a big new natural gas pipeline from Alaska to the Lower 48â''â''the biggest construction project in the history of the United States.â'' In particular, Palin explains the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act, which she got enacted immediately upon being elected governor. It established a competitive process for building the pipeline and limited the stateâ''s financial liability in the project to $500 million.

Palin may have blinked yesterday when ABCâ''s Charlie Gibson asked her whether she was really ready to be U.S. commander in chiefâ''actually she blinked several times even as she told Gibson the thought did not make her blinkâ''but her role in aggressively reorganizing the Alaska pipeline project arguably is the most substantial item in her resume and her finest moment so far. Though questions have been raised about some aspects of her role in the project, indisputably itâ''s an important projectâ''not merely of huge interest to Alaska, but of vital interest to the whole country.

Not to put a fine point on it, the Lower 48 need all the natural gas they can get. For every amount of electricity produced, natural gas generates half as much carbon as coal; this means that replacing any coal plant with a natural gas plant reduces carbon emissions from that plant by 50 percent. Natural gas also is a very attractive home heating fuel, superior to oil from most technical perspectives (cleaner, lower maintenance). Increasingly natural gas is used to fuel buses and fleet vehicles, from New York to Los Angeles, and as T. Boone Pickens has been pointing out, it can be a very attractive fuel for private cars as well. Not least, if dreams of a â''hydrogen economyâ'' ever comes to fruition, natural gas will be needed to feed the fuel cells.

In addition to pitching the pipelineâ''in an article she obviously wrote well before she had any inkling she might be on the Republican presidential ticketyâ''Palin argues for Congress to â''help Americans and Alaskans by streamlining access to [oil and gas] offshore resources.â'' She says that while ANWR may contain 9 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 10 billion barrels of oil, there are probably 24 billion barrels of oil offshore and perhaps 104 trillion cubic feet of gas. Thatâ''s enough gas she says to meet the entire U.S. demand for four and a half years.

Advertisement

Tech Talk

IEEE Spectrum’s general technology blog, featuring news, analysis, and opinions about engineering, consumer electronics, and technology and society, from the editorial staff and freelance contributors.

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up for the Tech Alert newsletter and receive ground-breaking technology and science news from IEEE Spectrum every Thursday.

Advertisement
Load More