Tech Talk iconTech Talk

Malaysia Air Flight 370 Would Not Have Disappeared if We'd Had This System

A real-time flight-data recording method could have given investigators a far better idea of what has happened to Malaysian Airlines Flight 370, says Krishma Kavi, a professor of computer science and engineering at the University of North Texas, in Denton.

Kavi described such a system in detail iIEEE Spectrum in 2010, calling it the glass box, in contrast to the black box, which records flight data and voice data. The black box can be replayed only after the fact, and then only if it can be salvaged from an airliner's wreckage; the proposed glass box would immediately transmit the data to the cloud—the network of servers that increasingly blankets the earth.

"I strongly believe that our version of the black box (glass box) would have provided information indicating that all components of the plane were operating" in the wayward MH 370,  he said in an email yesterday. "It would have provided data on speed, altitude, direction of the flight... in real time."

Read More

Soraa Aims for Better Light Quality with Gallium Nitride Tech

In the LED lighting industry, it’s an all-out race to lower costs and drive adoption. But LED company Soraa is betting that people will also purchase LEDs for the quality of light, as much as for efficiency and long life.

The Fremont, Calif.-based company said it intends to release a set of lamps later this year based on its third-generation LEDs, which use gallium nitride on a gallium nitride substrate. Soraa’s LED technology is different than most. The bulk of LEDs are made with GaN on a substrate of sapphire, while LED company Cree uses a silicon carbide substrate. A number of companies, including Bridgelux, are seeking to lower costs by manufacturing LEDs on larger silicon wafers.

Sapphire and silicon carbide substrates are less expensive and have mature production methods. By contrast, manufacturing on GaN substrates is far more challenging technically. Sorra was co-founded by LED pioneer, Professor Shuji Nakamura, in 2008 to commercialize GaN-on-GaN LEDs. The company began selling its first product, the MR16 lamp, in 2012. 

The advantage of having the same material for the active component and substrate is that there are fewer defects, so the LEDs can withstand high power, says Mike Krames, Soraa's chief technology officer. That translates into a relatively efficient conversion of current to light and good color rendering, he says.

Soraa makes LED lamps designed to replace halogen spot lights, which are often used in places where very good light quality is important, such as retail displays and museums. Light quality is measured by its color rendering index (CRI), or how accurately artificial lights display colors. Incandescent lamps, which include halogens, have a CRI of 100, and bulbs must have a CRI of 80 to meet the EnergyStar rating. Soraa’s lamps have a color rendering index (CRI) of 95.

In an effort to match the quality of halogen lights, Soraa starts with a violet LED and uses three phosphors to create a full spectrum of visible light, and thus a higher color rendering index, Krames says. Producing a wider spectrum of light requires more energy, but because it's an LED, its lights still have a big efficiency advantage over halogens with similar light quality, he says.

“Once people get more familiarity with their options, quality of light will be a bigger deal and a bigger driver of adoption than people believe,” Krames predicts.

Krames worries that consumers could be turned off by LEDs if manufacturers sacrifice light quality. Granted, Soraa’s entire business is centered on producing premium, high-CRI products so he has a clear bias. But light quality has not been the highest priority for LED manufacturers as they seek to replace other forms of lighting.

A report by the Department of Energy’s solid-state lighting program noted that LED prices have dropped dramatically and efficiency has improved over the past four years, but the quality has remained about the same. The majority of the bulbs surveyed by the DOE have a CRI between 80 and 85, which is the typical rating for compact fluorescent lamps.

Instead, LED lighting companies have focused on bringing down price—something they've been successful at. When Philips started selling a 60-watt equivalent LED bulb with omnidirectional light in 2010, it cost almost $40. Last week, Cree cut prices by 23 percent so that a 60-watt equivalent now costs under $10. It also introduced a 100-watt equivalent priced under $20.

Cree designed its bulbs with a vertical “tower” that gives off light from the center of the bulb to mimic the way an incandescent bulb glows. The CRI of its products are about 83, which is good enough for the majority of uses, says Mike Watson, the vice president of product strategy at Cree. “What we really care most about is what consumers see. Having done many demonstrations for consumers in stores, I’m stunned at the number of people who think an LED at 83 CRI is better than an incandescent at 100,” he says.  

New lighting labels require manufacturers to indicate CRI, which could draw more consumer attention to light quality. In addition, California put in place a voluntary specification for LEDs that sets a minimum of 90 CRI. The standard was put in place to avoid a flood of low-quality LEDs, which occurred when compact fluorescent bulbs were introduced, souring many consumers’ opinions on efficient lighting.

Higher quality light does mean a more expensive product, but Krames says there's potential to improve the economics of GaN-on-GaN LEDs. Soraa's third-generation LEDs improve energy efficiency by 30 percent and, since GaN-on-GaN is relatively new, there’s more room for improvement than existing technologies, Krames says.

Premium, high-CRI bulbs are now mainly used by commercial customers, but perhaps consumers will eventually buy in, too. “Once people start to get a taste for higher CRI lamps, they’re not going to want to go back,” says Krames. 

Why There's No Real Cyberwar in the Ukraine Conflict

Warnings of a cyberwar between Ukraine and Russia over the recent Crimean crisis have been greatly exaggerated. From the start, Russia seems to have relied upon traditional military force and a barrage of old-fashioned "information war" propaganda in its swift takeover of Crimea. Whatever cyber attacks that have occurred so far probably represent the work of Russian or Ukrainian "hacktivists" rather than strategic military strikes, experts say.

Read More

Teaching Cars To Feel Your Pain

Now we drive our cars; in the future, they'll drive us. In between, though, the division of labor will get a little murky, and there could be an unfortunate failure to communicate. Our cars will just have to learn to read us better.

The car that can see a driver's emotional state written on his face could anticipate a bout of road rage and head it off. It could offer advice, or it could just humor the poor, carbon-based life-form. "Yes, that fellow in the red sports car really was rather thoughtless," the car might say, sympathetically. "They really shouldn't let people—I mean, people like himon the road, should they?"

The facial-recognition part of that scheme is under investigation at the Signals Processing Laboratory of the École Polytechique Fédéral, in Lausanne, Switzerland. Researchers trained the system on photos to identify anger or the closely related emotion disgust, then validated the system by testing it on videos, including many taken inside a moving car (provided by the French auto maker Peugeot Citroën, a collaborator in this research).

Read More

California's Dreamin' About Autonomous Car Regulations

Tuesday's public hearing on the regulation of robocars shows that California's Department of Motor Vehicles is sticking to a state mandate to produce a law by year's end. That would make it the first state to accommodate the routine use of autonomous vehicles. (Nevada was the first to approve their use for research purposes.)

The regulators' job is harder than it looks. "The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience," argued jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., long ago. California's regulators must rely on logic alone.

Read More

NASA Needs Coders to Help Prevent Asteroid Armageddon

Savvy coders can soon help NASA defend Earth against asteroid threats and win some cash prizes in the bargain. The U.S. space agency has joined forces with an asteroid-mining company to recruit programmers who can help identify asteroids in the slew of images taken by ground-based telescopes.

Read More

Flock of 104 Spacecraft Set for Launch

(Update, 16 May: After a successful launch in mid-April, KickSat suffered a fault a few weeks later that reset its master clock. The spacecraft reentered Earth's atmosphere on 13 May before it had a chance to deploy the Sprites.)

(Update, 14 March: The launch of the SpaceX rocket that will carry KickSat to space has been postponed until 30 March at the earliest.)

In a few weeks time, a fleet of 104 spacecraft the size of small cheese crackers should be released into space.

This will be the first free-flying test of what could be a new approach to space exploration, one that aims to use bare integrated circuits as spacecraft. Since chips are small and easy to mass produce, it might be possible to launch them by the thousands for use as distributed sensors to monitor space weather, measure the ionosphere, or explore other planets. As Cornell University professor and former NASA Chief Technology Officer Mason Peck described in a 2011 feature for IEEE Spectrum, tiny chip-based spacecraft might ultimately be able to fall gently onto Martian plains without a parachute or coast around for weeks in Titan’s thick atmosphere.

For this mission, each spacecraft in the small armada has a mass of just 5 grams and fits its solar panels, logic, communications gear, and sensors on a single square circuit board measuring 3.5 cm on each side. “They’re way smaller than anything else that’s flown in space—on purpose at least,” says organizer Zac Manchester of Cornell University.

Read More

Electrical Stimulator to Prevent Migraines Receives FDA Approval

Pharmaceuticals are so 20th century. Medicine's buzzy new trend is electroceuticals: ways to treat ailments with electricity rather than chemicals. Yesterday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a new entry into this field, when it gave the nod to a device that prevents migraines by electrically stimulating nerves in the cranium. The device is manufactured by the Belgian company STX-Med, and is already approved for commercial sales in Europe, Canada, and Australia.  

Cefaly, a battery-powered device that resembles a tiara or a headband, can be used for daily 20-minute sessions. The FDA says this treatment may help migraine patients who can't tolerate or don't respond to medication.

The device works by stimulating the trigeminal nerve, the largest cranial nerve, which carries sensory information from the face to the brain, and which has also been associated with the pain of migraine headaches. According to the Cefaly website, its mechanism is based on the gate control theory of pain. By providing sensory input to the nerves, the device essentially keeps a neural gate closed to pain input. This theory explains why you rub your elbow after banging it—the sensory stimulus overrides the pain stimulus, which is transmitted to the brain on different nerve fibers. 

The FDA's approval is based on several studies conducted in Europe. One study of 67 migraine patients, published last month in Neurology, found that Cefaly users experienced significantly fewer migraines over the course of a month than patients who used a placebo device. However, in a user satisfaction survey, only 54 percent of patients who rented a trial device said they wanted to purchase the device. As those users who returned the Cefaly were shown to have used the device for only about half the recommended time, it seems possible that migraine patients are still more comfortable with popping a pill than wearing a tiara around the house.  

The product video provides more information, although there's a good bit of jargon to deal with. It may help to know that nociceptors are the receptors on neurons that respond to a pain stimulus. 

Image and video: Cefaly

“Naked Truths” About Wearable Electronics

So, maybe you’ve bought a Nike+ Fuelband or a Jawbone UP band. Maybe it’s still on your wrist, and you check its data compulsively. But maybe it’s in a drawer, with your clunky smartwatch, your portable HD radio, and your Microsoft Zune.

Or maybe you are an early adherent of Google Glass, stoically enduring the discomfort and occasional aggression of friends, relatives, passersby, and drunk, enraged bar patrons. On the other hand, perhaps, like app developer Q Manning, you’ve concluded sadly that Google Glass is “great for texting and that’s about it.”

“I don’t think wearable technology has found its niche,” Manning added during a panel session Monday at the SXSW Interactive conference. “We all know we want it, but we don’t know what we want it to do yet. We’re all waiting for someone to solve that problem, but, unfortunately, Steve [Jobs] is gone.”

Manning’s co-panelists certainly had a few ideas, though, and one of them was vividly demonstrated by a pair of statuesque models who took the stage in technologically advanced and yet attractive underwear, prompting a blizzard of camera flashes. The demonstration came as close as could be reasonably expected to fulfilling the promise of the session’s title: “Tech Off Your Clothes: Naked Truths Of Wearables.”

The underwear were prototypes developed in a project called “Fundawear,” explained panelist Jay Morgan of the marketing firm Havas Worldwide. Havas had been hired by the UK-based manufacturer Durex, which was eager to associate its brand more with innovation. Though it offers an extensive line of personal massagers, for example, Durex is generally recognized only as a maker of condoms.

Havas was charged with coming up with a splashy innovation for Durex, and their brainstorming soon centered on the question, “can we do something for [lovers] when they are not together? Can you actually touch someone over the Internet?”

This proposal led to what can only be called a milestone in human civilization: the first ever electrically-engineered underwear. Fundawear was designed by another of the SXSW panelists, Billie Whitehouse, whose firm is called Wearable Experiments. The prototype Fundawear samples are close-fitting black undergarments equipped with tiny haptic electromagnetic vibrators, which produce a momentary sensation much like piezoelectric-based units used to create the quick vibration in a smartphone when a key is touched. The units are strategically installed in the garments—in the female version, in both brassiere and panties—to make contact with sensitive regions of the body. When the wearer’s partner touches his or her smartphone—the sensitive regions are helpfully indicated on a template on the phone’s screen—the wearer feels a gentle frisson, or even a light stroke, depending on whether the partner has touched or swiped the screen.

The engineering challenges were nontrivial, Morgan explained. First, they wanted to create the sensation of a lover’s gentle touch, and finding a technology that could reliably and safely produce that feeling—and be laundered—wasn’t easy. “There was some great work in electroactive polymers at the University of Auckland,” Morgan explained. “We contacted them and they said, ‘where are you going to stick this stuff?’ And we said, ‘down in your pants.’ They said, ‘Oh, that’s probably not a good idea,’” noting that the polymers operate at 4500 volts.

Another challenge was making instantaneous contact, no matter how far apart the partners were. An app pairs the wearer’s smartphone to his or her garment, using WiFi (Bluetooth would be used if Fundawear is put into production, Morgan said). But the users’ phones have to communicate with each other securely and instantaneously. The design team solved that one by using Amazon Web Services, a cloud scheme, to convey the data between phones. Each partner has a secret key to assure security, Morgan added.

Eugenia and Stephen, the models who wore Fundawear at the SXSW session, were delighted with it. “It’s a very light vibration, like a touch,” said Eugenia. “It depends on how you touch,” she said. “If you slide, it’s like a stroke.” The two did not know each other prior to the SXSW assignment, and they each controlled their own undergarment, Eugenia said. “We didn’t want to be too intimate in this situation,” she explained. (Stephen didn’t have a comment.)

Morgan said executives with Durex’s Global Product Development Team are studying the feasibility of putting the wearables into production. He said a decision could be announced in the next several months.

Wearable Experiments’ Whitehouse demonstrated another possible direction for wearables at the session. She was wearing her Navigate Jacket, which pairs to a smartphone app and gives gentle and appropriately timed taps on the left or right shoulder to guide the wearer to a destination.

Asked about the future of the jacket, Whitehouse replied, possibly with tongue slightly in cheek, “The future of this jacket, for me, is inductive-charging coathangers.”

Later in the session, when asked about what people, particularly older people, really want in wearable electronics, she said: “My mother, in particular, just wants a device that repels all other technology. That doesn’t let people track her, or contact her.”

Fighting Buggy Code with Genetic Algorithms

The offspring of a genetic algorithm and a data-structure-reading spider could hunt down and eliminate the software bugs that plague development projects from websites to automotive sensors.

If a 2012 Cambridge University business school study has it right, programmers spend about one-quarter of their working lives debugging. (They devote another 25 percent of their workdays to designing and writing code; paperwork and meetings eat up the rest.)

With a shrug and a sigh, we’ll pass by the obvious implication (kill the meetings and shelve the status reports) and move on to bug hunting, the blood-sport that consumes three months of the work year.

It’s clearly useful to automate software testing, and engineers are doing that whenever they can—particularly in complex applications. But they still have to develop input data sets and testing strategies, and those can be a bottleneck. The programmers can hand-build data sets and test the code unit by unit. They can formulate rules to generate random collections of well-formed data. They can search old files or try to cadge sets someone else once used for something that was sort of similar.

If only you could automate the automation and quickly generate suitable test inputs, and then optimize them to cover as much code and uncover as many flaws as possible.

Software engineers at Germany’s University of Saarland are among the hunters pursuing this quarry. The school’s Software Engineering Department has developed a number of methods for automatically generating tests, particularly for applications with structured inputs. To date, they’ve optimized test-generators for Web pages (a package called WebMate, commercialized by TestFabrik); Java apps (Exsyst); Android apps (DroidMate, whose motto is: “Android apps are great. But when they crash, hang, or violate your privacy, they suck.”); and, most recently, for XML and JSON (XMLMate, “Search-based XML input generation”).

At first glance, the methods seems focused on Web services, but bugs in almost any software project can be fair game.

“The best thing is that we are completely independent from the application area,” says department Chair Andreas Zeller. “With our framework, we are not only able to test computer networks, the processing of datasets, websites or operating systems, but we can also examine software for sensors in cars."

To test a so-called cyberphysical system, like an automotive sensor (photo), “All you need is a way to translate XML into the structured input formats required by the system under test, which usually is a straight-forward translation process,” Zeller says.

The packages are, well, evolving. The most recent test generators apply genetic algorithms to initial seed data and continually improve upon it.

And the latest, XMLMate, helps to automate and improve the seeding process. In a paper prepared for this June's International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA 2014), Zeller, Nikolas Havrikov, and Matthias Hoeschele describe “search-based” input-set generation: the test-generation software combs through XML schemas (the files that define how objects are to be categorized and treated) and sample test-input files gathered from all over. These are processed into a number of input packages of validly formed data.

These packages are the “chromosomes” on which a genetic algorithm forces evolution. XMLMate swaps, recombines, substitutes, and just generally mutates the input-package data—following the rules of the schema, of course. Then it pumps input package after input package through the “subject”—the program being tested. XMLMate tracks the results and scores each input-package’s relative “fitness.” The fittest test inputs activate more lines of the evaluation program’s code…and provoke the greatest number of errors. The unfit data sets—the dull ones that don’t stray off the beaten path and don’t cause any trouble—lose the evolutionary struggle and are flushed from the gene pool. The trouble-making elite are saved for another round of evolution and reaping.

The Saarland researchers tested XMLMate on six XML-processing programs: Rome, a library for processing RSS and Atom syndication feeds; JEuclid, a library for rendering and converting MathML;  Freedots, which renders MusicXML musical notation into Braille and MIDI audio; Apache Batik and SVG Salamander, libraries for modifying, converting, and rendering Scalable Vector Graphics; SVG Image, a “simple” Java SVG rendering app; and FlyingSaucer, an XHTML-and-SVG rendering library

At this point, automated approaches haven’t achieved complete coverage of every line of the subject’s code. Indeed, coverage ranged from a few percent to just under half. The tests did find, however, that search-based test generation consistently increases coverage by anywhere from 10 percent to (in the extreme case of Freedots) more than 900 percent over randomly generated test inputs. Or, as the paper puts it, “Evolving sample inputs achieve coverage that would not be reached by random seeds.”

Oddly, adding the genetic algorithm to the mix did not uniformly raise coverage per se. What evolving code did clearly do was increase the number of exception errors it could provoke (remember, exception generation factored into the fitness function). Overall, non-evolved, random-test-input packages generated 12 unique program exceptions in the six trial programs; tests that evolved from search-generated seeds turned up 28 errors. (Or, to put it another way, 16 fewer bugs for customers to find.)

Interestingly, the test program also turned up problems in programs that were not in the evaluation group:  They found “one small file” that shocked Firefox into consuming all available main memory and shutting down. Another input set crashed Opera. And some JEuclid test inputs crashed the Java 1.6 virtual machine on both Linux and Windows.

Right now, Zeller and his colleagues plan to make XMLMate available as open-source software…though it is also possible that TestFabrik, their WebMate partner, might commercialize the utility.

Illustration: Randi Klett; Images: iStockphoto
Photo: Oliver Dietze/Universität des Saarlandes


Tech Talk

IEEE Spectrum’s general technology blog, featuring news, analysis, and opinions about engineering, consumer electronics, and technology and society, from the editorial staff and freelance contributors.

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up for the Tech Alert newsletter and receive ground-breaking technology and science news from IEEE Spectrum every Thursday.


Textbooks: The New Digital File Sharing Frontier

The music industry, which for years has been complaining about unauthorized copying and distribution of their intellectual property, now has company. Sharing their piracy misery are textbook publishers. An increasing number of book titles are showing up on peer-to-peer file sharing sites, as students, with Napster as a historical blueprint, copy then digitize hundreds of pages in order to make them available over the Web for free. What would motivate a college kid to stand at a photocopier for hours? Revenge. Many students feel that they're being fleeced by publishers who, aided and abetted by professors, force new and ever …

Load More