Tech Talk iconTech Talk

Despite Its Status as a Chip Powerhouse, Taiwan Neglects Supercomputing

A quick glance at the new ranking of top supercomputers gives a surprising showing by one of the world’s technological powerhouses. Taiwan does not possess a single machine powerful enough to make the Top500.org list. While there are many nations that don’t make the list, Taiwan is peculiar in that it has such an outsized grip on the computer chip industry. What’s more, its political rival, China, not only holds the world’s top machine, it now has more ranking supercomputers than any nation except the United States.

It has been a long decline. Taiwan’s most powerful machine supercomputer, the Advanced Large-scale Parallel Supercluster also known as ALPS or Windrider, ranked 42nd in June, 2011, shortly after its launch.

 But the process of upgrading Taiwan’s supercomputing infrastructure has been slowed by ineffective government budget allocation. Since 2013, the National Center for High-performance Computing (NCHC), which operates Windrider, has failed twice to get its budget boosted enough to strengthen its supercomputing ability. While other countries poured money into the installation of powerful supercomputers as a way to show national power, Windrider fell to 303rd then 445th in June 2014 and June 2015. 

“If our three-year budget proposal is approved early next year, Taiwan would gain a much better position on the Top 500 in 2018, when a 2 petaflops system is launched,” says Jyun-Hwei Tsai, Deputy Director General of NCHC. If such a system were launched today, it would rank 36th.

The Ministry of Science and Technology says it understands the importance of supercomputing and prioritized it in its budget proposal as it had in 2013 and in 2014, officials say. However, it’s really up to the Cabinet.

Cabinet spokesman Lih-chyun Sun says the government fully understands the importance of supercomputing and points out that Taiwan has promoted cloud computing and big-data projects. “It remains uncertain when sufficient budget would be made available for new systems. We’re still reviewing the budget proposal. The decision has not yet been made,” Sun says.

“The Cabinet will make a final decision early next year,” adds Tzong-chyuan Chen, Director General of the Department of Foresight and Innovation under the ministry. “In economic recession years, it’s difficult to gain budget for important science and technology projects with long-term impacts, which are not yet felt.”

It wasn't always like this. In June 2002, an IBM system at the NCHC center ranked 60th. In June 2007, the center’s newest system, called IRIS, ranked 35th. 

Taiwan’s IRIS, however, was eventually kicked out of the Top 500 list in November 2009 due to a boom in supercomputer installations in many other countries, such as China. The world’s most powerful system, China’s Tianhe-2, or Milky Way-2, has held the top of the biannual Top 500 list six times in a row. And it is one of 109 systems in China that made the list. The huge increase in China's supercomputing power in recent years can be attributed in part to some government-back companies, such as Sugon and Inspur, which together manufactured 64 of the ranked systems.

According to NCHC’s Tsai, the big strides taken by other countries is a sore point in Taiwan. “We don’t compare ourselves with big countries, such as China, Japan, and the United States. What frustrates us more is that, in South Korea, the momentum of national supercomputing is now stronger than ours,” he says. Currently, South Korea’s two fastest systems rank 29th and 30th.

It’s not as if there isn’t much demand for supercomputing in Taiwan. Currently, Taiwan’s Windrider utilization exceeds 80 percent.  “It’s like a crowded superhighway. And we’ve heard complaints from some users,” NCHC’s Tsai says.

According to Tsai, Windrider is most significantly used in basic physics, chemistry, biomedical imaging. But certain key fields get prioritized access. Those include environmental studies, climate change, earth science, natural disasters, and water resources management.

“Taiwan is prone to natural disasters, such as typhoons, floods and earthquakes. A powerful database, backed by powerful supercomputing systems, is essential for conducting better predictions of typhoons,” Tsai says.

Due to the limit of Taiwan's supercomputing capability, some scientists have taken to building their own computer clusters and speeding up existing resources by making graphics processing unit-based accelerators.

Tzihong Chiueh, a theoretical astrophysicist at National Taiwan University, says they had not relied on NCHC’s system for years. Since 2013, his team has been taking advantages of a self-built system, that can reach tens of teraflops.

“A petaflop-scale system, should it be funded by the government, would certainly be useful to researchers,” he says. “The investment should indeed be prioritized. I hope it can work at least 10 times faster than the current system.”

This story was corrected on 17 December. Windrider was the 303rd ranked supercomputer in June 2014.

Testing Einstein's Theories With Satellites Stuck in Eccentric Orbits

In August of last year, when ESA launched its fifth and sixth Galileo navigation satellites, things went wrong. Because of a fault in the upper stage, both spacecraft ended up in elongated elliptical orbits instead of circular ones, making them unusable for navigation. Subsequent corrections of their orbits restored their function as navigation satellites, but their orbits still remained highly elliptical, with a difference of about 8,000 km between their closest and most distant points from Earth.

To the satellite navigation engineers, this was a nuisance requiring changes in the software and the technology. But for physicists, the eccentric orbits offered an unexpected opportunity. Researchers at both Sytèmes de Référence Temps Espace, or SYRTE (a department of Paris Observatory), and ZARM (the Center of Applied Space Technology and Microgravity) at the University of Bremen, Germany, convinced ESA to use the satellites to test more extensively an effect predicted by Einstein's general relativity. They hope to find out more about the extent to which time slows down when the gravitational field diminishes as one moves away from Earth.

This effect, also called gravitational redshift, or time dilation, has been previously observed; the need to correct timing signals transmitted from navigation satellites because their clocks operate slightly slower than those on the Earth's surface is a matter of routine. And the relationship between the slowing of time and the distance from Earth was tested in 1976 with the one-shot experiment, the Gravity Probe A, that reached a height of 10,000 kilometers. Using a two-way microwave link between the ground station and the Gravity Probe A, researchers directly compared the speed of the maser clock aboard the spacecraft to that on the ground, and confirmed the slowing of time with an accuracy of 140 parts in a million.

 Maser clocks are large and complicated instruments that measure time with an extreme precision, and are only carried by navigation satellites.  As their precision allows the accurate measurement of the relativistic slowing of time, the researchers at SYRTE and ZARM (ZARM had even proposed the building of a dedicated satellite in the past) jumped at the opportunity. “There are not many opportunities where you have a good clock on an eccentric orbit in space,”says Sven Herrmann, a physicist at ZARM.  “This is a combination that happened by chance; it was bad luck but also good luck.”

Unlike Gravity Probe A, the Galileo satellites don’t have a microwave link that allows direct access the maser clock frequency.  However, the researchers will be able to use the existing spacecraft-to-ground communication infrastructure, including the GNSS to perform the test.

ESA decided to go ahead with the test after a workshop in February 2015. The data taking, which will last for a year, will start in 2016.  “An important consideration for this decision was that the general relativity tests we are going to perform may be done in a transparent way, without any interference in the nominal operations of the satellites,” says ESA Global Navigation Satellite Systems Senior Advisor Xavier Ventura Traveset.

The Gallileo satellites continuously send messages about their position and the time on their clock, explains Herrmann.

We will reconstruct the data, the clock frequency, from the measured travel times. The satellite transmits a time stamp when the message leaves the satellite, and the receiver on the ground also produces a time stamp, and you calculate the travel time. If you know the position of the satellite, you can reconstruct the behavior of the clock on board the satellite. 

Precise accounting of the distance of the satellites is crucial to the determination of the maser frequencies. The researchers plan to use optical laser ranging, bouncing laser beams on retro reflectors mounted on the satellites to get an accurate measurement.  

The researchers expect that the accuracy of the relativistic slowing of time will be four times as accurate as the Gravity Probe A results. The large number of repeated measurements, as compared with Gravity Probe A’s single measurement, will give researchers a new bunch of numbers to analyze. “We have this large modulation in gravitation now, with 8,000 kilometers change twice per day...that will help us with the statistics,”  concludes Herrmann.

Rewired Rose Plant Becomes Living Cyborg

“Every rose has its thorn,” the song goes, but not every rose has electronic wires running through its body. The futuristic idea of plant cyborgs is making the leap from science fiction to real-world science.

What’s the big deal? 

Swedish researchers have been working on ways to regulate plant growth, using electronic wires grown inside the plants own nutrient channels to host sensors and drug-delivery systems. The aim is to provide just the right amount of plant hormones at just the right time. Such efforts could provide even more precise human control over plant production and agriculture.

A separate but no less exciting project involves embedded biofuel cells that could literally turn plants into solar power plants. If all goes well, sensors and other devices could someday harvest electricity from the natural process of photosynthesis that enables plants to turn sunlight into chemical energy. It’s not often that such a sweet-smelling prospect begins with a humble garden rose. But that’s where the first successful steps toward electronic plants has begun. A team at Linköping University in Sweden has taken a huge step forward with the first experiments demonstrating electronic circuits within the living bodies of plant stems and leaves. Their research is detailed in the 20 November 2015 issue of the journal Science Advances.

They grew electronic wires as long as 10 centimeters within garden rose stems and turned leaves into patchy electronic displays capable of changing colors between light and dark on demand. They also built working transistors—the basic switches at the heart of modern electronics—based on the wires embedded within the plants.

“In a sense, we are then introducing a nervous system into the plants,” says Magnus Berggren, a professor of organic electronics at Linköping University in Sweden.

But the researchers didn’t perform Frankenstein-style surgery to implant the wires. Instead, they made use of the xylem, plants’ natural system of channels that typically carry water and nutrients from the roots to stems, leaves, and flowers.

The team’s early attempts to thread conductive polymer wires through the xylem led to the xylem being clogged or the plants exhibiting severe toxic reactions. But the researchers eventually discovered that a liquid solution containing a polymer called poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), or PEDOT, could readily be taken up by the xylem and distributed evenly throughout. What’s more, they found, it would eventually form a solid wire capable of conducting electricity. The presence of such “xylem wires” still allows the channels to carry the necessary water and nutrients for plant survival.

Berggren explained how the liquid solution containing dissolved chains of PEDOT-S:H—a chemical variation of PEDOT—was able to form solid wires with the help of both the xylem’s vascular channels and the plants’ delayed immune response: 

After some time, the plant reacts against this unknown material. A common reaction against pathogens or toxic materials involves exchange of monovalent ions with divalent ones. The increase of divalent ions promote self-organization and formation of the actual conducting wires along the inner walls of the xylem channels. In a sense, the plant is helping us to separate the the event of distribution of the conducting and electronic materials from the event of film formation along the xylem walls.

Successful creation of the xylem wires also allowed the researchers to create “organic electrochemical transistors” within the plants; these transistors convert chemical signals into electronic outputs. Such transistors could form the basic hardware for more sophisticated plant cyborg devices. The team even used the plant circuitry to demonstrate digital logic gates—the building blocks for performing more complex electronic and computing operations.

Other experiments turned the leaves of roses into living electronic displays. The Swedish researchers accomplished this by encapsulating a leaf in a syringe filled with a different PEDOT solution. When the syringe’s plunger was pulled up, it created a vacuum that sucked gas out of the leaf through the “stomata” pores on the leaf surface. Once the syringe plunger was pushed down, the PEDOT solution rushed into the pores to fill the spaces between the leaf’s veins.

The result was a patchy network of conductive material within the leaf. Researchers sandwiched the leaves between PEDOT films to create electrical contacts with the PEDOT inside the leaves. That enabled the team to remotely manipulate the material within the leaves, changing their color between lighter and darker patterns. The switch between light and dark typically took about 20 seconds. The researchers observed that a pattern, whether light or dark, would remain visible for about 10 minutes.

The researchers mostly experimented with cut rose stems and leaves, but what works in garden roses could also help create other electronic plants, Berggren said. The basic structure of roses resembles those of larger plants such as trees, which means trees could also theoretically become living plant cyborgs or “e-plants.”

Femtosecond Lasers Drive a New Generation of Network Vector Analyzers

Researchers at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB, the German national standards institute in Braunschweig) have used lasers to improve on a widely used and extremely precise instrument for measuring signal strength and phase in electronic components. The new laser-driven terahertz vector network analyzer (VNA) could offer broader frequency coverage and higher resolution at a lower cost than today's instruments.

By using a VNA to precisely plot the signal amplitude and phase over time, designers and troubleshooters can see how signals are transmitted and reflected by components and connectors. This lets them characterize signal scattering and timing shifts that can affect a design’s performance.  In addition, national standards authorities use VNAs to define voltage pulse standards for calibrating oscilloscopes, photodiodes, electrical pulse generators, and the like.

In research published in IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, PTB’s Mark Bieler, Heiko Füser, and Klaus Pierz note that though existing VNAs are extremely precise, they have grown more complex and more expensive as operating frequencies have topped 1 THz.

The PTB team constructed a prototype of a simplified vector network analyzer using a femtosecond laser to generate test signals—short, precise voltage pulses. The pulse travels down a short strip of gold (4 mm long and 0.5 micrometers thick) deposited on a gallium arsenide (GaAs) chip. The pulse’s electric field changes the gallium arsenide’s index of refraction, so another laser beam can track and measure phase and amplitude as the signal travels down the strip. The method can resolve signals traveling both up and down the conductor, so researchers can also measure the signal reflected when the pulse encounters another material in the circuit. By generating pulses over a range of frequencies, the PTB scientists can thoroughly characterize the performance of the “device under test.”

Thanks to its relative simplicity and the falling size and cost of femtosecond laser sources, the researchers say, the new VNA is “relatively cheap,” and offers an “incredibly broad frequency bandwidth spanning three orders of magnitude” with a single piece of hardware. The prototype does have at least one drawback, say its originators: so far, its 40-decibel dynamic range (able to detect signals whose amplitudes differ by two orders of magnitude) is considerably smaller than the best conventional VNAs, which have a range of 120 dB (six orders of magnitude)or more.

The new device uses a flash of 800 nanometer light (produce by frequency doubling the 1600 nm light of an erbium-doped pump laser) to activate a “biased photoconductive gap”—essentially an open switch that closes when hit with laser light—at the beginning of the waveguide. This allow current to flow across the gap, but the switch opens again almost immediately. The resulting 90-fs pulse zips down the circuit. A probe beam, a 1600 nm flash from the same erbium-doped laser, shines onto the GaAs substrate. If the passing pulse has changed the GaAs’s index of refraction, the probe beam’s polarization changes accordingly. This can be measured and (with a little manipulation) reveals the shape, amplitude, phase, and direction of the pulse...and of any signals from internal reflections.

To See Deep Inside a Volcano, Use a Telescope Built for Quasars

How do you peer into the hidden heart of a volcano? Use a leading-edge telescope designed to track quasars and supernovae.

The next-generation Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescope, now under construction in Serra La Nave near Mount Etna in Sicily, is designed to track the highest of high-energy celestial events—objects spitting out cosmic gamma radiation, high-frequency photons with energies from 1 teraelectronvolt  to 100 TeV. (100 TeV is 1014 electron-volts; compare that to the 5 x 103 to 150 x 103 eV of a medical X-ray.)

Read More

New Supercomputer Ranking Shows China Still on Top

The TOP500 supercomputer ranking, published today, shows China’s Tianhe-2 supercomputer remaining at the top of the heap, with its 33.86 petaflops/s. The number-two spot also remains unchanged: Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s Titan supercomputer, which can run at 17.59 petaflops/s.

Indeed, there is little change in the top 10 positions, with only two new names appearing in that elite group, Trinity (number 6, managed and operated by Los Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories) and Hazel-Hen (number 8, at Höchstleistungsrechenzentrum Stuttgart). These systems were both installed in 2015, as was Saudi Arabia’s Shaheen II supcomputer, which ranks 9th. The seven other supercomputers in this grouping date from 2013 or earlier.

As you’d expect with such little turn over at the top of the list, the overall rate of growth in performance of the world’s top supercomputers has been slowing in recent years. But the summed performance of the world’s 500 fastest supercomputers is still up by 55 petaflops/s over the TOP500’s June 2015 ranking.

If there’s any take-home message coming through from today’s ranking, it’s the growing dominance of Chinese supercomputers on the world’s stage. China now has 109 supercomputers in the top 500, up from just 37 in July. At the same time, the U.S. share has dropped from 231 to 200. And the European component is also down, from 141 in July to 108 now.

If China ends up using its computing behemoths to significantly advance its industrial prowess, companies in other parts of the world might well worry about the trajectory evidenced in today’s rankings. But that, of course, is a big “if.”

RANK NAME SITE RMAX(TFLOPS/S)
Not much change was reported in the world's 10 most powerful supercomputers.
1 Tianhe-2 National Super Computer Center in Guangzhou
China
33,862.7
2 Titan DOE/SC/Oak Ridge National Laboratory
United States
17,590.0
3 Sequoia DOE/NNSA/LLNL
United States
17,173.2
4 K computer RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science (AICS)
Japan
10,510.0
5 Mira DOE/SC/Argonne National Laboratory
United States
8,586.6
6 Trinity DOE/NNSA/LANL/SNL
United States
8,100.9
7 Piz Daint Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS)
Switzerland
6,271.0
8 Hazel Hen HLRS - Höchstleistungsrechenzentrum Stuttgart
Germany
5,640.2
9 Shaheen II King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Saudi Arabia
5,537.0
10 Stampede Texas Advanced Computing Center/Univ. of Texas United States 5,168.1

How to Design a Robot You Can Swallow

Vanderbilt engineers want to speed up the development of capsule robots. So they have created an open-source modular platform that people with limited experience can use to build their own prototypes. Biomechatronics engineer Pietro Valdastri and his team launched the platform this summer and at least one outside research group is planning to put it to work in the coming months.  

A medical capsule robot is a small, often pill-sized device that can be maneuvered inside the body after being swallowed or surgically inserted. Most prototypes use wireless electronics or magnets or a combination of the two to control the movement of the capsule. Such devices have been outfitted with cameras to allow observation and diagnosis, with grippers to take biopsies, with sensors that ‘feel,’ or palpate, the tissue, and even with mechanical needles that administer drugs. 

Read More

Vizio Smart TVs Snitch on Viewing Habits to Advertisers

Most smart TVs connected to the Internet do not track your viewing habits by default. But the 10 million Vizio smart TVs sold so far will automatically track viewing habits and share information with advertisers from the get-go unless customers disable the option.

Read More

Finally, the Jetpack We've Always Wanted

The reality of personal jetpacks has been a disappointment. It's almost been more disappointing than if they'd been left to science fiction, because reality hasn’t come anywhere close to living up to what comes to mind when we imagine what a personal jetpack should be like.

One of these disappointments was the RocketBelt, which had the right form factor, but let you fly for only 30 seconds before running out of fuel. The RocketBelt's inventors have been working for the last 40 years (!) on something better, and they've finally managed to develop an honest-to-goodness backpack-sized jetpack. It runs on actual jets, it (probably) won't set you on fire, and the videos make it look exactly like what we've been fantasizing about.

Read More

Can uBeam's Through-the-Air Phone Charging System Live Up to the Hype?

UBeam, a high-profile start-up backed by some of Silicon Valley's most prominent investors, has become a tech industry sensation because of the wireless charging technology it says it has developed. UBeam's technology, promised for delivery next year, is supposed to efficiently charge a mobile phone through the air using ultrasound, keeping the phone’s batteries from being depleted even as you chat away at home or at your local coffee shop.

And according to uBeam, this plugless charging goes not just for mobile phones. On its website, the company says, “The impact uBeam will have across industries will be profound.” Meredith Perry, who founded uBeam in 2011 when she was an undergraduate at the University of Pennsylvania, says that the charging system will be as useful with household appliances as it will be with mobile handsets. It even promises to improve health care, she declares. “Because bacteria can spread via electrical outlets,” hospitals using uBeam “will be cleaner and safer for patients.”

But the company, which has yet to demonstrate a fully-functioning prototype, is now facing an onslaught of questions about whether it can actually deliver the breakthrough it is promising.

UBeam presentations give the impression that its setup can blanket an entire home or perhaps the premises of a small business with electric power that allows an electronic gadget to pick up electrical charge as easily as it can now send and receive Wi-Fi signals. But its eponymous product transmits only a small amount of power within a very limited radius—and then only if there is nothing between the transmitter and the receiver. Each room would need at least one transmitter, and possibly many more, with each device costing hundreds or even thousands of dollars—hardly the makings of the “world without wires” the company promises on its website.

Further, ultrasonics experts say it is entirely conceivable that delivering a few watts through the air to a mobile phone could easily require scores or even hundreds of watts in the overall system. This, they say, would make uBeam an environmentally questionable way of charging an iPhone or similar device.

While the company has made several technical advances involving ultrasound, “the idea that uBeam is going to eliminate the need for wires is ridiculous,” said one person with knowledge of the situation.

The company appears to have suffered an exodus of technical talent. With the exception of Perry, none of the engineers listed on uBeam’s patents are still at the company, according to their LinkedIn profiles. What's more, uBeam engineers are said to feel as though they were being pressured by management to describe the technology in more optimistic terms than they were comfortable with.

The company, now based in Santa Monica, has raised more than $20 million, with backers including Mark Cuban, Yahoo's Marissa Mayer, Tony Hsieh of Zappos, and a number of prominent venture capital firms such as Andreessen Horowitz. One April estimate gave it a possible valuation of $500 million.

Coverage of uBeam has generally been enthusiastic; this includes a recent BBC report, as well as scores of magazine and newspaper stories. Fortune asked in a headline whether Perry was the next Elon Musk. But much of the breathless media coverage has since been shown to be technically innacurate.

“The technology makes it possible for a device to move freely around a room, in a pocket or purse, while constantly charging,” said a New York Times article from last year. And an earlier Engadget item said, “the system will be able to detect a uBeam puck in the room and charge it if it's anywhere within a 20 to 30 foot radius.”

Neither of those statements are true, something even uBeam now essentially concedes.

Technical persons familiar with the company, but who would speak only anonymously, raised questions about uBeam with IEEE Spectrum. On-the-record information was also provided by physicists and engineers who, while lacking inside information about uBeam, are experts in the general technical challenges associated with ultrasound.

While popular press accounts of the company have been laudatory, comments in technical Internet postings have been far more critical.

Perhaps the most devastating critique was a 3,000 word post on EEVblog Electronics Forum, which, among other things, says that a large room will require dozens of transmitters to provide full coverage. What is striking about that last post is the nearly universal praise it has received for accuracy, with the endorsements coming both from persons familiar with uBeam as well as highly-credentialed outside experts. Several from the former category said they couldn't find any mistakes. “He did a very good job with it,” said one.

Many of the themes of the EEVblog piece were echoed by remarks from well-known ultrasound experts.

Butrus T. Khuri-Yakub is a professor of electrical engineering at Stanford and a key developer of a method for converting ultrasound into electricity. Khuri-Yakub said that Perry contacted him in 2011 to ask if the technology would be useful in the uBeam system she was contemplating. In recent weeks, Khuri-Yakub said, he had another lengthy technical conversation with Perry. Khuri-Yakub said he spoke with Perry as a professional courtesy, and that he has no relationship with the company and is therefore not privy to the details of its technical plans.

Nonetheless, he said he was “doubtful” that the company's technology could charge mobile phones at rates “anywhere comparable to what one can do with a wire connected to a wall outlet.”

Perry has often said she wants to make wireless charging as common and easy as Wi-Fi. John Fraser, a Stanford-trained applied physicist who has spent his career in the ultrasound industry, said basic laws of physics make attaining that goal extremely unlikely.

“Efficiency is not a big deal when you're transmitting a signal. You might transmit a one-watt radio signal for Wi-Fi, but your computer only needs to detect 1 microwatt to be able to process the signal. But efficiency is a very big deal when you're transmitting power. I don't think ultrasound over distances of tens of feet is every going to be practical. Even two meters is pushing it.”

In a TED speech from 2012, Perry seems to brag that she knew nearly nothing of physics before starting the company—not even how a TV remote control worked. She said the basic idea for uBeam came after only a few hours of Googling, yet portrays herself as the first person to have thought of using ultrasound for wireless power. “It seemed like an awesome idea,” said Perry. “Why hadn't the ultrasound experts thought of it before?”

Actually, they had. Many times. David R. Andrews, a physicist whose UK-based Cambridge Ultrasonics advises companies about ultrasound designs, said ultrasound experts have been thinking about using it for wireless power for many decades, but invariably dismissed it as being impractical because of well-understood laws of physics.

“You can use ultrasound to transmit power, but it's always going to be a tiny amount,” he said. “The possibility of using uBeam technology to replace all cables in the home is a pipe-dream.” He was especially critical of the notion of using a uBeam-style system to charge high-wattage household appliances, and noted that because the technology is a line-of-sight system, each room in a house would need its own uBeam transmitter, each costing, he estimated, hundreds or even thousands of dollars.

Andrews and other experts say there are numerous challenges inherent in using ultrasound for safe and efficient wireless power transmission at anything more than very short distances.

Ultrasound signals attenuate extremely rapidly in the air. William M.D. Wright, an associate professor of mechanical engineering and ultrasound specialist at University College Cork in Ireland, told IEEE Spectrum that at a frequency of 60 kilohertz, which is within the range uBeam has discussed using, a signal will typically fade to half its original strength within just three meters, and to one-tenth at 10.1 meters.

Another major challenge involves the efficiency of devices used to convert electrical energy to ultrasound, and then back again. There are a number of well-understood methods for doing so, but none of them are close to being perfectly efficient; even the best ones make no more than 30 percent of the energy available in the original form available after conversion. Each of these issues compound each other, meaning that in order to deliver a few watts of power to a mobile phone, such a system may well need to draw scores or even hundreds of watts.

According to uBeam, its plan is to provide a cover for a mobile phone, much like the protective covers commonly used today. But the entire back of its cover would function as a receiver. Transmitters could be located on walls or in ceilings. This means, though, that if a cellphone user were holding the phone up to his or her ear for a conversation, as normally occurs, a hand would be blocking most of the receiver, and thus most of the charging signals. The result would be the same if the user were holding their phone in the palm of their hand while looking at the screen.

(Oddly enough, a publicity photo released by the company, and used in scores of articles, shows a uBeam transmitter on the wall, and a hand holding a phone wrapped in a white uBeam receiver. While the picture is presumably meant to show uBeam in action, because the receiver is pointed away from the transmitter, it is likely not receiving any substantial charge at all, says Wright. So the PR photo portrays a scenario in which the pictured transmitter is, in fact, useless.)

The only public uBeam demonstration was at a 2011 technology conference; Perry showed off a proof-of-concept system delivering power across a few feet. The demo, available on YouTube, seems to have wowed the Silicon Valley types in attendance, and was the springboard for much of the company’s later fame. One prominent tech pundit in attendance wrote that the demo was “the closest I have seen to magic.”

But physicists interviewed for this article said any awe is completely unwarranted. Perry’s demonstration, “was pretty trivial,” says F. Joseph Pompei, an MIT-trained physicist whose company, Holosonics, works with ultrasound. “It was very similar to other experiments done using ultrasound to transmit low levels of power over the last few decades.”

The 2011 unit was an early prototype using off-the-shelf components. Pompei says, “one would expect” that whatever technology the company has since developed is more sophisticated. “If they can pull it off, I'd love it,” he said. “But if they are confident about the technology, they should publish their data and show the device. And the press would be well-served to reserve the accolades for uBeam until after something has been shown that really works.”

A staple of press accounts about uBeam is the unattributed report claiming that the company is negotiating major technology deals with the likes of Starbucks. One account from March said a pact with the coffee company was “especially close to signing.” No such deals have been announced, and one of the questions uBeam declined to answer was whether it was the source that planted these rumors in the first place. Starbucks declined to discuss the matter.

While uBeam has received a great deal of press attention, the company seems to work with the media only on it own terms.

After IEEE Spectrum began making inquiries about the company, a uBeam spokesperson suggested it might be willing to share certain unspecified internal data that it said would back up its claims—but with the stipulation that the data not actually be published.

The offer was withdrawn, though, when the company discovered that IEEE Spectrum was using LinkedIn to approach ex-uBeam employees for possible interviews, a relatively common practice for reporters.

"What would you possibly gain from reaching out to a former executive assistant with no engineering background?" asked a spokesperson in an email to a Spectrum reporter. “This isn't TMZ, this is IEEE.”

IEEE Spectrum e-mailed uBeam several lists of questions about the issues being raised in this article, but the company declined to answer any of them.

In an e-mailed response, a uBeam spokesperson said the questions had “a negative slant,” and added, “If you want to write about real science, for a scientific audience, you would reach out to us and work with us in a collaborative rather than offensive way.”

Over the weekend, uBeam provided an interview to a Silicon Valley tech blog in which it provided a few details that it had previously withheld—saying, for example, that its system is designed to deliver a minimum of 1.5 W, and that a single transmitter could operate at distances of up to 4 meters. (That's much less power than mobile phone owners are used to; the USB converters sold by Apple range from 5 to 12 W.) UBeam told the blog that it would begin demonstrating its system next year.

Engineering experts were not particularly impressed with the new details. David W. Greve, with the department of electrical and computer engineering at Carnegie Mellon, wrote in an e-mail that, “What's missing is HOW they plan to achieve the required sound intensities and receiver efficiency. I am not suspecting that these are unachievable; what I am not sure about is how practical, efficient, and economical the transducers can be. My gut feeling is that a system of this sort will not be very efficient and will be practical for at best limited applications.”

The recent TechCrunch article also quoted two ultrasound experts in an apparent attempt to bolster the company's claims. But what was most striking about their quotes is how little they actually said in support of uBeam.

Both men, Matt O’Donnell, a medical ultrasound expert at the University of Washington, and Babur Hadimioglu, a Stanford-trained electrical engineer who works in the ultrasound industry, were quoted saying essentially the same thing: that wireless power via ultrasound is possible—an issue never known to be in dispute. However, neither provided any opinion about whether uBeam could in fact engineer and then effectively commercialize the system it is promising.

In an interview with IEEE Spectrum, both men said they had been contacted recently by uBeam last week about being willing to provide some sort of a press statement; Hadimioglu said the company told him that it was expecting negative publicity soon. He said he wasn't familiar with the company, and his research into uBeam simply involved reading its website.

“As a scientist, I want to be open-minded and not too skeptical,” Hadimioglu told IEEE Spectrum. “But I am an applied technologist, and know that uBeam is facing a very challenging problem, to say they least.”

One noticeable change evident in the recent TechCrunch article is that uBeam now appears to be far more modest in the claims it is making to reporters. A September piece in the same blog said uBeam, “could power up your phone while it’s in your pocket when you’re at a cafe,” something company critics said was simply impossible because of the line-of-sight nature of ultrasound waves. The latest post concedes the point, saying, “the system requires a line of sight and can’t charge through walls or clothes.”

While she declined to answer IEEE Spectrum's questions, Perry frequently posts to Twitter. Following the publication of the EEVblog post, she wrote a series of revealing tweets.

She started with a quote she attributed to Mahatma Gandhi: “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” She went on to say, “You just can't win with people that want to bring you down,” and then added “but I got news for you guys. I'm a resilient SOB and you're going to have to nuke me to kill me.”

Advertisement

Tech Talk

IEEE Spectrum’s general technology blog, featuring news, analysis, and opinions about engineering, consumer electronics, and technology and society, from the editorial staff and freelance contributors.

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up for the Tech Alert newsletter and receive ground-breaking technology and science news from IEEE Spectrum every Thursday.

Load More