In its latest episode, Robots, the podcast for news and views on robotics, takes a closer look at French robotics company Aldebaran and its humanoid Nao. Aldebaran's Vice President in Engineering Luc Degaudenzi and his colleague Cédric Vaudel, who is Aldebaran's Sales Manager for North America, discuss the Nao's success in the RoboCup Standard Platform League, share details on the robot and outline how they see the future of the market for humanoids. Read on or tune in!
Updated May 20, 4:23 p.m.: Added National Instruments comments; 5:49 p.m.: Added Willow Garage comments; May 21, 11:21 a.m.: Added details on competing robotics software platforms; 1:50 p.m. Added Herman Bruyninckx comments.
Microsoft's new and now free release of its Robotics Developer Studio includes new 3-D simulation environments like this multi-level house.
Over the past year or so, Microsoft's robotics group has been working quietly, very quietly. That's because, among other things, they were busy planning a significant strategy shift.
Microsoft is upping the ante on its robotics ambitions by announcing today that its Robotics Developer Studio, or RDS, a big package of programming and simulation tools, is now available to anyone for free.
Previously, RDS had multiple releases: one free but with limited features, a full commercial version that users could purchase, and an academic version distributed only to partners.
By releasing a single version with full capabilities and at no cost, Microsoft wants to expand its RDS user base, hoping to amass a legion of hobbyists, researchers, entrepreneurs, and other robot enthusiasts who will come up with the next big things in consumer robotics.
I spoke about the new plan with Stathis Papaefstathiou, who leads the robotics group and is responsible for Microsoft’s robotics strategy and business model.
"We decided to take out all of the barriers that today our users might have in order to help them build these new [robotic] technologies," he told me.
Papaefstathiou (pronounced papa-ef-sta-THI-u) says that price is a big limitation for mass produced robots. "That means that in the consumer space it's not about sophisticated hardware, it's about the software stack."
He says RDS has been downloaded half a million times since it launched in 2007. The company estimates it has about 60,000 active users.
So over the past two years the robotics group, which is part of of an elite software division called Startup Business Group led by Amit Mital, who reports to Craig Mundie, set about devising a plan to expand Microsoft's stake in robotics.
Not everyone is convinced the new plan makes sense.
"This is all just a non-event," says Herman Bruyninckx, a robotics professor at K.U. Leuven in Belgium and coordinator of EURON, the European Robotics Research Network.
Bruyninckx, an advocate of free and open source software who started OROCOS, or Open Robot Control Software, a framework for robot control, says that making RDS free is not a change in strategy and nobody he knows in the robotics community is "talking about RDS, let alone using or planning to use it."
Papaefstathiou says that in addition to creating a single RDS release, Microsoft is also making the source code of selected program samples and other modules available online, hoping to improve collaboration among users. In particular, the group wants to entice the growing community of hobbyists, do-it-yourselfers, and weekend robot builders.
He also says there will be closer collaboration with other projects at Microsoft. He mentions Project Natal, a motion tracking user interface that Microsoft is creating for the Xbox 360. He says Natal's ability to track gestures could "be available also in solutions where human-robot interaction becomes important."
Will the new strategy work?
A factory model is now part of Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio's simulation environments.
RDS is not a robot operating system -- it's a comprehensive set of development tools, samples, and tutorials. It includes a visual programming interface, a popular 3-D simulator, and also Microsoft's CCR and DSS runtime toolkit.
But despite its broad range of tools, RDS works best with the specific robot platforms it supports, including iRobot's Create, LEGO Mindstorms, CoroWare, Parallax, and others.
These are great robot platforms but by no means the only ones. In fact, many budding roboticists today are using Arduinos and programming ATmega microcontrollers to build innovative robots. Why would they need RDS?
Microsoft has plenty of competition as well. Other robotics software platforms include Urbi by French firm Gostai, ERSP by Evolution Robotics, and the Player/Stage Project.
One platform that is rapidly gaining adoption and has shown impressive results is the Robot Operating System, or ROS, a broad set of open source tools by Silicon Valley robotics firm Willow Garage.
Other users, including a growing number of high school students participating in the popular FIRST robotics competition, use National Instruments' LabVIEW tools and controllers to program their robots.
Papaefstathiou acknowledges that there are alternative software packages that can do some of the things -- visual programming and simulation, for example -- that RDS does, but he insists that "there's no single competitor for the overall toolset that we have."
As for Willow Garage, Papaefstathiou says they're "targeting different platforms and different capabilities," adding that some of the robots they're using are half million dollar systems.
"People are doing a great job in developing robotics technology there, but this is not something that goes into scale," he says. "And we here in Microsoft we are about scale."
Not surprisingly, Willow Garage disagrees.
"We designed ROS to be flexible and open, because researchers and application developers alike need to be able to inspect, improve, and extend the system," says Brian Gerkey, Willow Garage's director of open source development. "As a result, ROS is now used on a wide variety of robots, from inexpensive iRobot Creates to sophisticated humanoids and even autonomous cars. It's only through open source that we can reach this level of adoption and community involvement."
National Instruments, for its part, welcomes Microsoft's move.
"I'm glad to see that National Instruments, Microsoft, Willow Garage and other major players are aligned on a critical missing element to the robotics industry crossing the chasm and really taking off," says Shelley Gretlein, senior group manager of NI's real-time and embedded software. "The key is in the development software. Lowering the software barriers will make it easy to get into robotics."
Microsoft established the robotics group in 2007 under the leadership of Tandy Trower, a software veteran who'd headed some of Microsoft's largest and most successful businesses, eventually becoming a minister-without-portfolio reporting directly to Bill Gates.
Trower and Gates believed the consumer market was the right place for the next biggest innovation in robotics, finding parallels with the beginnings of the PC industry, a view Gates described in a now-famous Scientific Americanarticle, "A Robot in Every Home."
But things changed late last year when Trower left Microsoft to start a healthcare robotics company. The company chose Papaefstathiou, an unashamed Trekkie -- "Data is very inspirational" -- with a background in high-performance computing, as the robotics group's new leader. It's up to him now to turn Gates' a-robot-in-very-home vision into reality.
I do see potential for a big expansion of RDS. But my impression is that it will be strongest among schools and universities. Now any engineering school in, say, Brazil, Russia, India or China, could use it and have students programming robots, or at least simulating them.
The question is, Will promising, cool robotics products for the consumer market emerge from a larger RDS community? I asked Papaefstathiou what kinds of commercial robots he envisions would be around.
He wouldn't give me specific examples, preferring to say it was up to "the community to think broader about the scenarios."
"Consumer robotics is a new product category and building [applications] there requires leveraging the capabilities and inspiration of a broader community," he says. "This is exactly what we want to do.”
Microsoft's robotics squad. Left to right: Stathis Papaefstathiou (general manager), Russ Sanchez (creative director), Branch Hendrix (business development), Stewart MacLeod (development), Hunter Hudson (quality), Mukunda Murthy (program management), George Chrysanthakopoulos (distinguished engineer), and Chris Tham (engineering).
You can add a new entry to the long list of problems that can be solved by robots: arranging tables in a conference room. On my personal workplace hassle scale, I'm not sure that moving conference room furniture ranks much above "occasional nuisance." But Yukiko Sawada and Takashi Tsubouchi at the University of Tsukuba, Japan, evidently find shoving tables to be an unappealing task for humans. So they built a room that could re-arrange itself.
In this case, the tables are the robots. Select the arrangement you want from a graphical interface, and the tables will move to their new locations. The movement is monitored by an overhead camera with a fish-eye lens, and the software uses a trial-and-error approach to determine the best sequence of motion. But it's best to see the room in action for yourself. Check out the video the researchers presented at ICRA earlier this month.
In the paper, the authors explained the rationale for the project:
In these days, at conference rooms or event sites, people arrange tables to desired positions suitable for the event. If this work could be performed autonomously, it would cut down the man power and time needed. Furthermore, if it is linked to the Internet reservation system of the conference room, it would be able to arrange the tables to an arbitrary configuration by the desired time.
I'm not sure the cost and complexity of such a system could ever be low enough to be practical, but there's definitely something fun about watching the tables reconfigure themselves. And if you already have autonomous, why not go all the way and add a reconfigurable wall?
The Neato Robotics XV-11 robot vacuum made its first appearance in December of last year, and we got a brief hands-on with it the following January at CES. Like the iRobot Roomba, the XV-11 is an autonomous robotic vacuum. Unlike the Roomba, the XV-11 maps the room it’s cleaning and follows an efficient pattern to minimize cleaning time. Neato says that the XV-11 is smart, fast, and powerful, and they lent us a unit for a day to test out… How’d it fare? We’ll show you, with lots of pics and a video, after the jump.
The first thing you’ll notice about the Neato XV-11 is that it has a square front, which sort of makes it look like it’s going backwards most of the time until you get used to it. The square front helps the robot clean more effectively along walls and in corners. The front also has a wrap-around bumper that actuates if it encounters an obstacle, and small sensors on the sides of the bumper help it avoid obstacles while turning. Around the back (which is the round bit, remember) is the exhaust vent for the vacuum, the charging contacts, a plug-in charging port, and a potentially exciting little USB port.
Underneath, the XV-11 is pretty straightforward. It has one single spinning brush with rubber flaps, and that’s it. There’s a little squeegee blade behind the brush, and the vacuum itself is back inside the brush compartment. Edge sensors around the front edge keep the robot from falling down stairs.
On top is a recessed latch for the dust bin, the other side of which is a recessed handle that you can use to pick the robot up. The giant orange button wakes the robot up and starts it cleaning, while you can set the rest of the options on the little LCD screen (more on that later).
The last interesting bit is, of course, the dome on top of the robot that houses the laser scanner (or distance sensor, if you prefer). There’s a laser emitter and a receiver, and they spin around inside to make a map of the room that the XV-11 is cleaning in. The laser itself has a power of 2.1mW at at a wavelength of 785nm, which is in the near-infrared, so you won’t see it. Also, it’s designated as Class 1, which means that it is safe under all conditions of normal use (for humans and pets).
The design of the charging dock is pretty clever. It’s a little bulky, but it’s flatish, so it’s minimally intrusive to set against a wall. Since the XV-11 doesn’t have to drive up on anything, it just presses against the contacts, it’s harder for it to accidentally shove the dock around. Also, part of the reason that it’s bulky is that it opens up to reveal hiding places for the power adapter and extra cord. Need more cord length? Pull some out. Need less? Stuff it back in. Very handy.
It’s a little bit difficult to discuss a list of features on a robot with a selling point of “push one button and it does everything you need it to do on its own.” But if that’s not enough for you, there are ways to avoid having to actually bend down and push that button.
The XV-11 features on-board scheduling, which lets you set different times on different days for the robot to wake itself up, clean your floor, and then go back to its dock. I set it up without reading the manual, which is the ease with which all interfaces should work. The LCD also provides status and support information, and lets you pause and resume cleaning and direct the robot to go back to its dock.
Cleaning technique is what makes the XV-11 so interesting. When the robot starts to clean a room, it’ll move out into the room a bit and then spin up its laser rangefinder and start to map. It looks for walls, doors, obstacles, and tries to identify areas where it needs more information. When it has some idea of how your room is laid out, it decides what route to take and begins to vacuum, continuing to map as it goes, which allows it to adapt to changes that happen while it’s cleaning (new objects on the floor, moving furniture, stuff like that).
While cleaning my living room, the XV-11 began by going around the outside of the room to where my sofas and coffee table are. It spent a bunch of time getting into all the nooks and crannies around the sofas and under the table legs, and then finished cleaning around the perimeter of the room. Finally, it covered the open space in a series of straight back and forth lines, shut off its vacuum, and made a beeline back for its dock, job done. Total time elapsed: just over 12 minutes.
While cleaning, the XV-11 appears remarkably intelligent. It moves with purpose and with a recognizable pattern. Despite its shape (which prevents it from making zero-radius turns in tight spots), the amount of information that it gets from its laser sensor, bumper, and side sensors gives it very good spatial awareness, and it didn’t get stuck once. In some cases, it took the XV-11 a little bit longer to move around complex areas like forests of chair and table legs because of its square front, but it knows what shape it is and has no trouble getting around things. It’s also low enough to fit under most furniture, and it’s pretty determined… If it thinks it can squeeze underneath something, it’ll try as hard as it can to do so.
The XV-11 has no trouble moving from room to room. When the laser sensor maps an area, it pays special attention to anything that looks like a doorway, and remembers that it needs to go through there later after cleaning the room that it’s currently in. If the robot is cleaning multiple rooms and gets low on battery, it will remember its location and the progress it made, go back to its dock and charge, and then return to where it was before and finish up.
If there are areas that you don’t want the XV-11 going into, you can keep it out by laying out a magnetic strip that the robot will vacuum up to, but not across. 15 feet is included along with the robot, and you can cut it up to suit your needs.
We’d seen the XV-11 in operation before, but only on square pieces of carpet that don’t accurately reflect what most people’s homes look like. My living room, on the other hand, features hardwood, deep carpet, shallow carpet, tables, chairs, cords on the floor, and the occasional cat. In other words, it’s a pretty typical living room, full of complications and potential hazards.
The XV-11 had no trouble with any of these things… In fact, it managed not to get stuck at all, which bodes well for its overall autonomous intelligence and robustness. The robot took just over twelve minutes to clean my living room, and it clocked nearly exactly the same time each time it cleaned. This is interesting, because it implies that the robot is calculating an efficient way to clean the room, and then recalculating a similar efficient pattern each time it cleans. Here’s what the pattern looks like:
It’s pretty easy to see what Neato is talking about here when they say that their robot cleans efficiently and in straight lines, because that’s what it does. Most of the floor, the robot covers exactly once. In more complex areas, it spends more time, but that’s less about inefficiency and more about just moving around. I mean, the robot shuts itself off before it returns to its charging base, because it knows that the floor has been entirely covered and it doesn’t need to waste energy keeping the vacuum turned on while it goes back home.
Since the XV-11 covers most area of the floor only once, it’s important that it cleans effectively. And for the most part, it very much does. Compared to an upright vacuum, the robot did just as well or better on hardwood, and comparably on carpet. There were only two circumstances in which the XV-11 didn’t clean especially well, both illustrated in this picture:
Issue one is the dirt around the coffee table leg. While cleaning, the robot was able to consistently get pretty close to the leg itself, but its square front didn’t help it clean more effectively there. The problem might be that no matter how close the robot can get itself to the table leg, there’s a limit to how effective it can clean there since the brush and vacuum don’t extend the full width of the robot. The same is true (in general) for cleaning along walls and in corners… Due to the design of the robot, there are some areas where the vacuum just can’t reach no matter how close the robot gets. However, it’s worth keeping in mind that this is the same for upright vacuums as well, which is why they come with hose attachments and stuff.
The other issue is that the XV-11 isn’t that great at getting cat hair out of carpet. It gets most of it, but for particularly tenacious hair, the rubber brush isn’t as effective as a bristle brush might be.
As far as cleaning along walls and getting into corners, while the XV-11 is shaped better for these tasks, it doesn’t always make it into a corner in its most effective orientation. For example, if the robot is following a wall on its right side and encounters a recessed doorway, it will turn into the doorway and follow closely along the door but misses the corner to its right where it first turns in. I’m being pretty picky about this, but it’s worth mentioning.
While the XV-11 might have some minor issues picking up pet hair, the upside is that after three runs around my living room (shared by three cats), here’s what the XV-11’s brush looked like:
And it’s not like it wasn’t picking stuff up, either:
To clean out the dust bin, you just lift it out of the top of the robot. To actually get the dust out, you have to remove the air filter (it snaps in and out), but this is actually kinda nice, since the dust bin stays closed until you get it to a place where you can dump it. Since brush maintenance seems to be minimal, emptying the dust bin is basically all you need to worry about on a regular basis.
If you do need to clean out the brush area, it’s easy. The bottom panel releases with two clips, and you can pull the brush right out. It’s belt driven, which is kinda cool, and reinstalling it is as simple as sliding it back under the belt again.
And that’s pretty much it. Conceivably, you’ll need to replace the air filter and possibly the brush or squeegee, and eventually, the batteries will wear out. All of these bits are available on Neato’s website for prices that are sort of reasonable, as long as you don’t need to do it too often.
Overall, the Neato XV-11 cleans fast and efficiently. It has some minor issues with a few specific aspects of how it cleans, but I feel like there is a great deal of potential with this robot. This is not to say that the XV-11 isn’t already impressive… It’s more like, there are lots of way that the robot could potentially be tweaked to make it even better at what it’s already good at, especially considering the amount of information (and level of detail) that its sensors collect.
For example, if the XV-11 can recognize a closed door, maybe its algorithm could be slightly modified to make an extra pass across the door from the opposite direction to be sure to get both corners. What I’m really hoping is that at some point, Neato will allow the users of its robots to plug into that USB port to take advantage of the XV-11’s impressive suite of sensors and modify its behavior themselves. Have some issue with the way your robot cleans? No problem, tweak it yourself, or download another user’s software over the internet.
On the hardware side, putting some bristles on the brush might make the XV-11 better at getting pet hair out of carpet, but might also make the brush more of a chore to clean out. Still, if Neato offered it as an option, then pet owners could decide whether or not they’d like to have less pet hair on their carpet and more tangles in their robot’s brush.
I wouldn’t worry too much about these quibbles, however… I believe that just as iRobot has, Neato will listen to their users and make upgrades and improvements based on real world feedback, and there’s no reason not to get one of the first generation XV-11s if you feel that its cleaning technique is right for you.
The Neato XV-11 is on pre-order for $399, to be available “this summer.” This makes it $50 more expensive than the Roomba 560 that we looked at yesterday, and $50 cheaper than the Roomba 570, which is (for all practical purposes) the highest end Roomba model. Tomorrow, we’ll compare them more directly, but the point is that XV-11 is quite comparable to Roombas with similar capabilities in terms of price, meaning that if you’re considering a robot vacuum, the XV-11 should definitely be on your list.
Meet QB. This skinny alien-looking robot may soon replace you at work.
But don’t worry. It doesn’t want your job. QB is a robotic stand-in for workers. You control it remotely as a videoconference system on wheels. Embodied as a QB, you can attend meetings, drop by a coworker’s office, even confab at the water cooler.
You can control your robotic self from anywhere using a computer connected to the Net. It’s a bit like the recent Bruce Willis movie Surrogates. Except QB is less, uh, muscular.
Anybots, a robotics start-up in Mountain View, Calif., is officially unveiling the telepresence robot today. QB will be available in the fall for US $15,000.
"We wanted to create a technology that allows remote workers to collaborate more fully -- and feel part of the team," founder and CEO Trevor Blackwell told me when we spoke a few weeks ago.
What they created is a sophisticated mobile robot. Its base houses a compact computer, two Wi-Fi interfaces, a LIDAR-based collision-detection system, powerful motors, and a lithium-ion battery pack that lasts 8 hours, or enough for a full day of work.
The head has a 5-megapixel video camera pointing forward, a lower resolution camera pointing down at an angle to help with driving, three microphone and high-quality speakers, and -- my favorite feature -- a laser pointer that shoots green light from one of its eyes.
The 16-kilogram robot [35 pounds] rolls on two wheels using a custom self-balancing system, an approach that Blackwell says is more power-efficient, lets the robot drive over bumps, and has proved quite stable. QB can rotate around its vertical axis, easily take turns, and drive at 5.6 kilometers per hour [3.5 mph].
Anybots says "robocommuting" could not only improve collaboration but also save companies' time and money. Employees can work from home or other locations and reduce commute and travel.
But the question I -- and I guess many other people -- might ask themselves is, Why do you need a robot if you have pretty decent videoconference systems? Cisco Systems, the leader in this area, even uses the term "telepresence" for its products (Jack Bauer is a major "customer," by the way.)
"Videoconference is confined to structured environments like conference rooms," says Bob Christopher, Anybots' COO. "We want people to talk and interact in non-structured environments, anywhere."
"With QB," he adds, "you can continue talking to your colleagues after you left the conference room."
To use QB you don’t need to add any extra hardware to the office -- all it needs is a Wi-Fi network. The robot connects to it like any computer and sends and receives video and commands over the Net.
Controlling the robot requires only a Firefox browser and a plug-in from Anybots. You log in and instantly start seeing and hearing what the robot is seeing and hearing.
It’s not Star Trek teleportation, but "incarnating" a robotic body is quite an experience.
I had a chance to try it and will report on my tests in an upcoming feature article in IEEE Spectrum and here on this blog. In the mean time, let us know: Is robotic telepresence the future of work?
QB Specs: 8 hours of battery life
5 megapixel video camera
Supports Wi-Fi 802.11g
3.5 mph normal cruise speed
Price: US $15,000
Availability: Fall 2010
The iRobot Roomba is not a new product. Since 2002, it has been (more or less) the only robotic vacuum available to consumers in the US. iRobot has been continually improving the Roomba, however, and the Roomba 560 is one of the latest and most sophisticated models. Now that there’s some new competition on the horizon, it’s a good time to take an updated look at the Roomba and what makes it a reliable and effective autonomous vacuum. We’ll have a review of the aforementioned competition (the Neato XV-11) up tomorrow so that you can compare the two, but for today, we have a review of the Roomba 560.
If you’re not familiar with the Roomba, here’s the deal: it’s a robotic vacuum cleaner that can clean your floors all by itself. All you have to do is tell it to start cleaning, and it’ll go clean, avoiding obstacles and getting around furniture and ultimately returning to its home base to recharge itself. There’s a lot more too it than that, of course… Lots more, after the jump.
The particular Roomba that we’re reviewing is a 560. The 560 is a fifth generation Roomba, which is a significant upgrade from the earlier 400 series. It’s generally about the same size and shape, with a 13″ diameter and a weight of about 8 pounds. It’s also quite stylish, with a slick black and silver color scheme that doesn’t make you want to hide it in a closet like a conventional vacuum. This is good, because having your Roomba in a closet pretty much defeats the entire purpose of a robotic vacuum, especially one with on-board scheduling like the 560 has. But I’m getting ahead of myself.
The Roomba is able to clean autonomously thanks to its suite of sensors. Proximity sensors on the front of the robot work with a physical bump sensor to help the robot avoid walls and maneuver around obstacles and furniture. Drop sensors underneath keep the robot from going over stairs or ledges. On top, the Roomba has an infrared sensor that allows it to find its dock and use virtual walls (more on those later).
All of these sensors provide a limited amount of information about the Roomba’s environment and path, but they don’t directly tell the Roomba where it is in a given room. Instead, the robot relies on an algorithm to tell it where to go next, and cleans in a variable pattern that ends up covering most areas of a room between three and five times. While this pattern looks totally random, it’s not, and the patterns are actually derived from MIT research on the efficient coverage behaviors of foraging insects.
To do the actual cleaning, the Roomba combines a vacuum system with two counter-rotating brushes. The brushes help pick up all the big things (with the bristle brush and rubber beater brush working together like a broom and dustpan), while the vacuum itself takes care of smaller particles and dust. All off this stuff ends up in a removable bin at the rear of the Roomba, which incorporates a replaceable air filter. The entire vacuum module (the green piece in the above picture) is flexible and can move up and down, which helps the Roomba to adapt to floors and different lengths of carpet. Since the Roomba is fetchingly round, it does have some issues getting into corners. On the right side near the front is a spinning brush that’s designed to mitigate that problem to some extent by sweeping dirt and stuff out of corners and back under the Roomba.
While the Roomba is entirely capable of cleaning by itself, it does take a little bit of work to “pre-clean” your floor for it to be most effective. The robot can’t lift things, of course, so if you have a bunch of stuff all over the floor, you’re not going to get the best cleaning. The Roomba will nudge things a bit, but it tends to get caught on stuff like loose clothing and may become stuck. If that happens, the robot will try to free itself, and if it can’t it’ll stop and beep at you to come free it. Not a big deal, but it does keep it from autonomously completing its cleaning, so it’s best to keep things tidy. Supposedly, the 500 series of Roombas are good at not getting themselves entangled in cords and rug fringes and other stringy things. This has not been my experience. I guess it’s partially my fault for having ten thousand power cords strewn all over the place, but the Roomba likes to grab them and then run away, unplugging things as it does. It also manages to (occasionally) rip out pieces of fringe from a rug. My guess is that the anti-tangle system works if the Roomba considers itself tangled, but it has a tendency to tug pretty hard before it reaches that point.
Overall, I’ve been very impressed with how well the Roomba cleans. I bought my parents a 530, which managed to fill its dirt bin in one run around our living room the day after the carpet had been professionally steam cleaned. The bristle brushes do a great job of picking up stuff like pet hair, and for beating dirt out of carpet. The Roomba is least effective in corners and around objects, where it can’t always get its brushes close enough to the edges of things. I ran the 560 every other day or so for about a week, and in each case, the floor (which is half carpet, half hardwood) was noticeably cleaner when it was finished, and the Roomba’s dirt bin was nearly full. It’s not a substitute for a conventional vacuum, not completely, but it does a pretty darn good job for day-to-day cleaning.
The 500 series Roombas also include a ‘Dirt Detect’ feature, which gives them the ability to sense where there’s a particularly dirty spot and then spend more time there (in a tight spiral). Incidentally, if there’s just one spot you want cleaned, you can set the Roomba down manually and have it ‘Spot Clean’ just that bit instead of the whole room.
To clean an average sized room takes the Roomba 560 about 45 minutes. This seems like an awfully long time, especially if you watch it at work, which you totally will, because it’s adorable. It can also be frustrating at times, since you start to wonder why it’s covered that particular spot 37 times but still hasn’t managed to catch the rogue dust bunny over by the couch. Remember, while the Roomba may look like it’s just bumbling around randomly, it’s actually following an algorithm designed to cover all areas of a room multiple times. If there are places you don’t want it to go, you can set up little round towers the project a ‘virtual wall’ of infrared light that the Roomba won’t cross. The 560 is able to clean up to four rooms before it needs to head back to its home base to recharge, which it does all by itself when it considers itself finished or when it’s low on battery power.
While the Roomba certainly cleans effectively, it tends to make quite a mess of itself while doing so, which calls for weekly maintenance (or more often, depending on how frequently you run it). I’m not talking about just emptying the dustbin… Dust and hair get trapped in and around the brushes, and even inside the brush bearings themselves, necessitating partial disassembly of the cleaning compartment. It’s very easy to do this, but it’s still a chore, and often extraordinarily tangled and dirty requiring patience (and scissors) to clean out.
Really, it’s surprising how well the Roomba is able to clean on its own. iRobot has gotten the design to the point where with a little bit of forethought, you can just leave the robot cleaning and come back a few hours later and it’ll be back on its base charging. The 560 gives you some additional options (if you trust it) to schedule cleaning for when you’re not around. This is all done on the robot itself using a few buttons and an LCD… You can set different cleaning times for each day, and the robot will wake itself up, clean your room(s), and then go back to its base. You still have to remember to empty the bin and clean it and stuff, but daily vacuuming doesn’t get much simpler than that.
Although we reviewed the Roomba 560, iRobot makes a variety of different models with slightly different capabilities (and different costs). The base 500 model is the 510, for $280, but you don’t want that one ’cause it doesn’t come with a charging dock. As you go up through the different (and increasingly expensive) models, you gain battery life, on-board scheduling, some accessories, and (eventually) the ability to use Lighthouses, which are special Virtual Wall units that help the Roomba navigate around multiple rooms. The 560 that we reviewed here costs $350 and can’t use Lighthouses, which is funny, since my other Roomba (a 535 model that cost $250 and appears to be discontinued) can. Anyway, when you’re looking at buying a Roomba, it’s important to put some thought into how you’re going to use it. You definitely want a 500 series with a self-charging dock, but as far as other features go, consider how many rooms you’d like it to clean, whether you’d like it to move from room to room on its own, and whether you’re going to start the Roomba cleaning yourself or you’d like it to start by itself (when you’re not home, for example). It’s important to remember, though, that the fundamental cleaning technology is basically the same. You can pay a bit more for some extra features, but the robot isn’t going to navigate any differently or pick up any extra dirt.
The 560 is a fifth generation Roomba. As such, it benefits from a half decade worth of improvements that iRobot has implemented based on customer feedback and testing. It’s a practical and polished robotic vacuum that works in your home and can actually make your life easier… Or at least, make your floors cleaner. You can pick one up at iRobot.com, but I might recommend that you buy it from a retail store like Best Buy so that you can try it out and take it back if it’s not for you. You won’t take it back, though… Once you let it run around your house a little bit, you’ll be sold. It’s awesome.
The groom is a robotics researcher. The bride works at a robotics firm. Robots brought them together. So when it came time to plan their wedding, the choice only seemed natural: A robot would conduct the ceremony.
The wedding took place today in Tokyo, according to this AP report. The groom was Tomohiro Shibata, a professor of robotics at the Nara Institute of Science and Technology in central Japan; the bride was Satoko Inoue, who works at famed robotics firm Kokoro.
Leading the ceremony was a little humanoid robot called I-Fairy with a high-pitch voice and flashing eyes. Kokoro, which unveiled the robot early this year, designed the I-Fairy as a robot receptionist and entertainer. It sells for 6.3 million yen (US $68,000).
The robot has a humanoid body in a sitting posture and, as the company puts it, its appearance was "based on the image of a lovely fairy." It can talk, gesture with its arms, and detect the presence of a person, according to this story in the Japanese blog Node.
Kokoro says this was the first time a robot celebrated a wedding.
At one point the robot told the groom: "Please lift the bride's veil."
Is it a sculpture? Is it a robot? The Balancing Cube is both.
The Balancing Cube is a robotic sculpture that can stand on any of its corners. Pendulum-like modules, located on the inner faces of the cube, constantly adjust their positions to shift the structure's center of gravity and keep it balanced. The cube remains stable even if you poke it. But not too hard!
Created by Raffaello D'Andrea, Sebastian Trimpe, and Matt Donovan at ETH Zurich, the contraption is half art and half technology. They got their inspiration from a Cirque du Soleil performance in which acrobats use their bodies to support each other and balance together in seemingly impossible positions.
See the result in the video below. I love the part when Trimpe pushes the cube slightly and its balancing mechanisms respond, the motors screeching as if he were teasing a living creature.
So how does it work?
The Balancing Cube is an example of a distributed control platform. Each module [see illustration below] is a self-contained unit with a computer, battery, motor, and inertial sensors (a tri-axis accelerometer and tri-axis rate gyro). So instead of relying on a centralized controller, the modules share their inertial data through a bus network. Then each module combines its own data with the shared data to determine the orientation of the cube -- and command its motor accordingly.
In other words, each module makes its own computations and moves its own motor, but as a result the combined motion keeps the system stable -- just like the Cirque du Soleil acrobats.
D'Andrea and Trimpe discussed the cube's control scheme last week at the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, in Anchorage, Alaska.
Their control algorithm uses inertial data to estimate how the cube is oriented relative to gravity and how fast it is moving. But this estimate is independent of the rigid body dynamics of the cube; that is, the algorithm doesn't require a dynamic model of the cube, and the method works both in static conditions and for when the structure is in motion.
The cube, made of aluminum, is 1.2 meter on its sides and stands about 2 m tall. It may look like a star, but that's because its faces consist of X-shaped elements. It's cubic shape becomes apparent if you imagine lines connecting its corners [see image above]. (Think of Isamu Noguchi's Red Cube in New York.)
The goal of the project was more than just building a high-tech piece of art. The researchers wanted to investigate the advantages and limits of distributed control. In particular, they knew that the balancing mechanisms didn't need to share all their sensor data, but they wanted to find out which pieces they did need to share.
In terms of hardware, they focused on a modular design, trying to create a balancing system that would consist entirely of self-contained mechanisms. Indeed, you can use their mechanisms to balance not only a cube but also other shapes.
A final but critical design requirement: the hardware had to be robust enough to withstand repeated falls.
Images and video: Raffaello D'Andrea and Sebastian Trimpe/Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control - ETH Zurich
Technology taking jobs is a notion that probably dates back to the invention of the wheel. After all, it took four bearers to carry the emperor and only one to pull a chariot!
The problem is that most people stop thinking after the first domino falls instead of following the chain of events further on. Let's continue the chain: Once the wheel is invented, more people can travel comfortably, goods can be carried farther, better roads are built and commerce thrives. A few bearers of the ruling class have to find new work, the remainder of the world benefits and thousands of jobs are created.
Let's fast-forward through history and take a look at the tractor. Now it happens that my grandfather bred workhorses. The family oral history has it that, upon the introduction of Henry Ford's tractor in the 1920s, the price of workhorses dropped 10 percent per week. My grandfather lost his farm, moved his family to Florida where my father at age 14 had the only job in this family of six, delivering newspapers. However, the advent of the tractor and modern farming techniques transformed the United States from a country where 40 percent of the population needed to farm to one in which 2 percent of the population could feed the other 98 percent. This freed a larger proportion of young adults to attend college and start the computer revolution that has created millions of jobs in the U.S. and worldwide.
Did people lose jobs to computers? Yes, a number of secretaries had to upgrade their skills, and executives who refused to learn to type had a tough time of it, just to cite two examples. But these jobs were replaced by tens of thousands of high-paying software engineering positions, plus computer installers, computer operators, data storage firms and more.
Simplistic thinking visualizes a fixed pool of jobs, with new technology taking some away. In reality, new technologies create new opportunities for many more people, specially our children. In the case of robots, the direct new jobs involve designing, building, programming, integrating, installing, servicing, maintaining, managing and refining the machines. Robots will enable humans to work in hostile environments where they could never work before: for instance, farming the ocean floor, mining super subterranean excavations, manufacturing in space and in Antarctica all become realistic endeavors. Building on nano- and cosmic scales begin to become practicable. The limited imaginations that believe jobs will stay the same, except that robots will do them all, should take a look around them.
If it were true that technology makes people poorer, would we not find evidence of that all around us? Technology-poor countries would have full employment and technology-rich countries would have the lowest GDP per person. Instead, in technology-rich nations, so-called "poor" people often own cars and televisions, have a roof over their head and food for their tables.
Of course, anyone can argue that material wealth does not make for spiritual wealth; that's a matter for philosophers to wrestle with. And certainly there is room for improving systems for helping those in transition between jobs. But finding evidence that technological advance decreases material wealth for the general population is very difficult. Technology raises the floor for all; it is the great uplifter.
Jeanne Dietsch is co-founder and CEO of MobileRobots, based in Amherst, N.H.