PHOTO: Benelux Press/Getty Images
|
2 April 2008—The same kind of peer-to-peer file
sharing that made Napster famous—and infamous—is being
used in a new research project in Europe that aims to
pipe TV programs over the Internet. As part of the
P2P-Next project, engineers from several European
universities, research institutes, broadcast networks,
and manufacturers have agreed to pool their expertise to
develop a file-sharing system, based on free open-source
software, that could someday allow users connected to
the Internet to deliver videos from anywhere to
anywhere—and to any number of people throughout the
world.
The four-year project, which has attracted more than
20 member organizations, including the British
Broadcasting Corp. (BBC), Delft University of
Technology, in the Netherlands, and STMicroelectronics,
will receive €19 million (US $29 million) from the
European Union under its Seventh Framework Programme,
with another €5 million to come from the project
partners. The goal is to develop not only an entirely
open P2P platform for delivering video on demand and
live webcast streaming services but one that is also
legal, secure, and reliable, according to Johan
Pouwelse, a professor at Delft University and scientific
director of the P2P-Next project.
The project reflects a growing European interest in
Internet-based television, including pioneering work by
the state-owned Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation,
which has launched a hugely successful TV series
delivered via P2P.
Internet video companies like YouTube could someday
benefit from the new technology, Pouwelse says: “Instead
of having every bit come from their own central servers,
which is costly, they could use P2P to reduce their
bandwidth costs.”
Unlike broadcasters, which beam shows from radio masts
to home antennas, or cable-TV networks, which send
content down a coaxial cable to set-top boxes in a
similar broadcast fashion, Internet-based TV providers
like YouTube require users to connect to central content
servers to fetch programs. Replacing broadcast and
cable-based TV service with the Internet would require
many more servers, not to mention the strain it would
put on content suppliers to provide sufficient bandwidth
to transmit the content. P2P technology, according to
Pouwelse, tackles this problem by sharing storage and
transmission tasks with all enabled users.
The initiative, however, competes against Joost, a
commercial Internet TV start-up that largely uses
proprietary P2P technology developed by the same two
Scandinavian entrepreneurs who launched the Kazaa music
file-sharing exchange and the Skype voice over Internet
Protocol (VoIP) service. There are also numerous
commercial Internet Protocol TV (IPTV)
offerings now available from European
telecommunications firms, mostly based on technology
from Microsoft. Both services have been
off to a bumpy start.
Joost, which introduced commercial service last year,
has suffered some technical glitches, resulting in
frequent downtimes, particularly in March. Users also
complain of excessive advertising, which many view as
disruptive. And rumors are afloat that the venture could
be on its last legs. IPTV has also proven a challenge
for many telcos in Europe and beyond. Initial hiccups in
deploying Microsoft technology forced a few operators in
Europe, such as Swisscom, to delay service; others,
including Deutsche Telekom, have yet to find the right
business model.
“IPTV is a telco approach with dedicated hardware, a
closed business environment, and walled gardens,”
Pouwelse says. “And although Joost uses some open-source
for minute components, it's largely proprietary
technology. P2P-Next is entirely open to all who want to
use it. The system offers more choice and a nearly
cost-free way for broadcasters to distribute content.”
Delft University, for instance, is contributing its
Tribler technology as a core component of the planned
P2P-Next system, according to Pouwelse. Tribler, which
stems from the word “tribe” and refers to its usage of
social networks, is a client application based on an
open-source implementation of the BitTorrent
communications protocol.
BitTorrent, widely used today for downloading TV shows
from the Internet, is designed to distribute large
amounts of data without the original distributor having
to pick up the entire tab for hardware, hosting, and
bandwidth costs. Through the protocol, each recipient
delivers pieces of data to other recipients, thereby
reducing the cost and capacity burdens on any one
individual.
Currently, BitTorrent traffic accounts for around 49
percent of traffic on the Internet backbone, of which
nearly 50 percent is TV programming, according to
Ipoque, a German company that specializes in monitoring
Internet traffic.
For years, P2P has been a key technology for content
pirates, offering an efficient way for them to share
files. Hollywood hated it—until last year when
BitTorrent's cofounders decided to go commercial. In a
move to win over the studios, as well as publishers of
videos, games, and software, cofounders Ashwin Navin and
Bram Cohen, the inventor of the technology, added
digital-rights management technology to protect content
and closed the door to open-source development. Fox,
MTV, Paramount, and Warner Brothers have since become
supporters of BitTorrent's new commercial service.
Pouwelse believes that the move by BitTorrent's
founders to sever ties with the open-source community
will, in the long run, undermine further development of
the technology, and that licensing fees will deter
others from using the commercial application.
Fortunately, some components of BitTorrent remain open
to implement, he adds, and ventures including P2P-Next
are using these to build new systems.
Another advantage of P2P-Next over Joost is its “zero
use” of servers, according to Pouwelse. The system will
allow any type of Internet-connected device to
participate, he says, adding that the venture will begin
with PCs and expand later to other devices. “By
distributing all functionality, we are aiming for
unbounded scalability,” he says.
What worked for one hugely successful P2P startup may
not work for all, however. With its largely proprietary
and somewhat centralized approach, Skype is arguably the
most successful P2P VoIP product in the world. The
venture found a niche and successfully exploited it. Its
business case is now under attack by telephone companies
rolling out national and international flat-rate fees.
The verdict on Joost is still out.
It's still too early to assess the chances of success
for the P2P-Next initiative. Numerous European
collaborative research projects have failed or
underachieved because of rigid bureaucracy, cross-border
rivalries, intercultural differences, or varying
opinions on direction. Pouwelse is also honest enough to
admit to the various problems inherent to P2P. “The
challenge of P2P is to turn something that can be
unreliable and potentially malicious into something that
is reliable and trustworthy and works,” he says.
Nevertheless, Pouwelse believes that the initiative's
approach—“open source, open papers, and open
comments”—could provide a big boost to the project in
particular and to the use of P2P technology in general
to deliver next-generation Internet TV services.
Others are equally optimistic. “It's a test bed for
new ideas, allowing us to collaborate with colleagues
across Europe and to hone and develop technology that
could help shape TV of tomorrow,” writes George Wright,
executive producer of the Rapid Development Unit within
BBC's Future Media & Technology group, in a blog on
the BBC Web site.
Pouwelse puts it another way: “This is really about
who will define and deliver the TV standard of the future.”