Photo: Irex Technologies
|
"Most Americans have the wrong impression that
diesel engines are dirty and produce more smog than a
standard engine" —Vincent O. Illi
DIESEL DOES IT
Although I am not an automotive engineer, I am
certainly quite the car enthusiast. I think the
reason that turbo diesel engines have not caught on
in the United States is twofold [Forum, May]. First,
most Americans have the wrong impression that diesel
engines are dirty and produce more smog than a
standard engine. Second, the torque curve on most
diesel engines makes them more difficult (as well as
awkward) to drive if the transmission is not geared perfectly.
Because of this, most auto manufacturers, I would
think, do not wish to produce turbo diesels. It
would require a different transmission along with
the diesel, driving prices up.
Vincent O. Illi
Frederick, Md.
ANOTHER HISTORY
"The Lost History of the Transistor" [May]
reflects the beliefs of U.S. engineers. Quite a
different story can be documented, one that makes
Bardeen's and Brattain's "invention" already 18
years old in 1947.
Germany's AEG patented the first device with
transistor properties in 1930. AEG requested the
right of priority on this invention in the United
States on 11 July 1929.
On 4 November 1938, physicists Rudolf Hilsch and
Robert W. Pohl, in Goettingen, Germany, published a
paper in Zeitschrift für Physik on "current control
by means of three-electrode crystal." Two years
later, in 1940, a Russian, A.L. Gorelik, published a
paper on his experiments with current-controlled
semiconductors in the journal Elektrichestvo.
May I hear other opinions on this subject?
Vlado Ostovic
Weinheim, Germany
CARING AND DARING
I deeply admire Salvador Castro for his courage
in speaking out against the design flaw in the
infant incubator [Careers, April]. Despite
sacrificing his career, he made a statement that was
crystal clear–"I'd do it again in a heartbeat." To
me, he is not a man who would ask, "What shall I
gain?" Instead he cares only about the question,
"What is right?"
If one chooses the other course–silence about any
abuse that affects society–what would it reflect
about the value of one's existence, especially for a
professional engineer? We must carry out our duty to
testify to truth and justice.
Hong-Lok Li
Vancouver, B.C., Canada
SECURITY HOLES
Clifford Jindra rails against cookies as if these
were a Microsoft invention [Forum, March]. They are
not. And we read ad nauseam about Microsoft's
terrible code, back doors, and so forth. The plain
fact is: there is no intrinsically secure operating
system software and there probably never will be.
Do users of non-Microsoft systems blithely connect
to the Internet without virus scanners and
firewalls, secure in the knowledge that without
Microsoft software to betray them, they are safe? If
so, why do I see security products advertised for
Mac, Linux, and Unix systems?
I have been using Microsoft systems for almost 15
years along with virus scanners and a firewall. I
have never been infected or hacked. Computer
security is everyone's problem, not just Microsoft's.
Garth Klatt
Calgary, Alta., Canada
OFFSHORE VIEW
A software engineer for 25 years, I formed a
small company in 2000 with partners in the Republic
of Georgia. Turning out several kinds of software, I
began doing what is now called offshoring.
I have found that it isn't possible to do offshore
engineering successfully without having strong staff
in the United States to support and guide it. The
U.S engineers must be able to design and track
projects, and communicate well about them.
I have seen that riding the offshore wave can move
careers along for U.S. engineers who can fulfill
contracts overseas. Rather than going overseas
directly, U.S. companies will do much better if they
deal with an engineer who acts as a liaison and runs
things from the United States. The hidden cost of
managing and learning to manage overseas resources
makes such engineering outfits a real bargain for
U.S. companies to deal with.
Brian Hanley
Brian.Hanley@konnectworld.com
PIXEL PRECISION
In "Tomorrow's TV" [April], the statement about
laser TV that the "pixels change at 115 kilohertz a
second" is not quite correct. The unit "Hz" is
itself equivalent to a certain number of occurrences
per second. In the above context, something like
"115 000 times a second" or "at a rate of 115 kHz"
would have made sense. That is the number of times a
second the vertical lines change, thus giving an
approximate horizontal resolution of 1900 pixels for
a 60-Hz frame rate.
Guillaume Rosanis
guillaume.rosanis@club-internet.fr
I find myself in conflict these days, because on
the one hand I don't want, and never intended, to
take jobs from U.S. citizens. On the other hand, I
know that the jobs we create overseas really make a
difference. This is underappreciated here, I think.
Second, it isn't possible to offshore engineering
successfully without strong staff in the United
States to support and guide it. Engineers in the
United States are very much needed, even in
offshored projects. But they need to be able to
design, track projects, and communicate well about them.
A part of me looks at the wave washing from the
developed world over to the developing world and
worries about where things will go. Another part of
me looks at the situation pragmatically and sees
that riding that wave is the way to move a career along.
My involvement came quite by accident. But I can
say without a doubt that there is plenty of room for
U.S. engineers to get contracts and fulfill them
overseas. U.S. companies will do much better if they
deal with a U.S. engineer who is running things here
and acting as the liaison than if they go direct.
The hidden cost of managing and learning to manage
overseas resources makes such engineering outfits a
real bargain for U.S. corporations to deal with.
CORRECTIONS
The "Beat the Heat" article [May] should have
stated that the Power Mac G5 chip is an IBM product.
Motorola produces the G4 chip.
We regret implying that the speed of light was
among the constants recently revised by the U.S.
National Institute of Standards [News Briefs,
March]. The speed was not altered and remains 299
792 458 meters per second.
–Ed.
Readers are invited to comment on material
published in IEEE Spectrum and on matters of
interest to engineering and technology
professionals. Letters do not represent the
opinions of the IEEE. Letters may be edited for
space and clarity. For more letters, see “…And
More Forum” at
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org.
Contact: Forum, IEEE Spectrum, 3 Park Ave., 17th
floor, New York, NY 10016, U.S.A.; fax, + 1 212
419 7570; e-mail, n.hantman@ieee.org.